AJP - Heart Calcium Transients and Cell-Sarcomere
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (September 22, 2006). doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00955.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
292/1/H43    most recent
00955.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cherry, E. M
Right arrow Articles by Fenton, F. H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cherry, E. M
Right arrow Articles by Fenton, F. H
Submitted on September 4, 2006
Accepted on September 20, 2006

A tale of two dogs: Analyzing two models of canine ventricular electrophysiology

Elizabeth M Cherry1 and Flavio H Fenton2*

1 Biomedical Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States; Physics and Astronomy, Hofstra University, Hempstead, New York, United States
2 Biomedical Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States; The Heart Institute, Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, New York, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: fhf3{at}cornell.edu.

The extensive development of detailed mathematical models of cardiac myocyte electrophysiology in recent years has led to a proliferation of models, including many that model the same animal species and specific region of the heart and thus would be expected to have similar properties. In this paper we review and compare two recently developed mathematical models of the electrophysiology of canine ventricular myocytes. To clarify their similarities and differences, we also present studies using them in a range of preparations from single cells to two-dimensional tissue. The models are compared with each other and with new and previously published experimental results in terms of a number of their properties, including action potential morphologies; transmembrane currents during normal heart rates and during alternans; alternans onsets, magnitudes, and cessations; and reentry dynamics of spiral waves. Action potential applets and spiral wave movies for the two canine ventricular models are available online as supplemental material. We find a number of differences between the models, including their rate dependence, alternans dynamics, and reentry stability, and a number of differences compared with experiments. Differences between models of the same species and region of the heart are not unique to these canine models. Similar differences can be found in the behavior of two models of human ventricular myocytes and of human atrial myocytes. We provide several possible explanations for the differences observed in models of the same species and region of the heart and discuss the implications for the applicability of models in addressing questions of mechanism in cardiac electrophysiology.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.