|
|
||||||||
1 Department of Biological Sciences, School of Medicine of Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, 38015-050; and 2 Department of Physiology and 3 Department of Neurology and University Hospital, School of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, 14049-900, Brazil
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The objective of the present study was to compare the morphology of the unmyelinated fibers in the aortic depressor nerves (ADN) of spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) and Wistar-Kyoto rats (WKY). In anesthetized rats, the ADN was identified by its spontaneous activity synchronous with the arterial pulses. Thin sections of the proximal and distal segments of the ADN were analyzed by electron microscopy, and a morphometric study of the unmyelinated fibers and Schwann cells was performed. The proximal segments of WKY and SHR ADN contain an average of 335 ± 68 and 130 ± 14 unmyelinated fibers, respectively (P < 0.05), and the distal segments contain an average of 337 ± 46 and 242 ± 77 unmyelinated fibers, respectively (P < 0.05). The distribution of the diameters of unmyelinated fibers was unimodal for both strains, with the histogram from the SHR significantly shifted to the left. Because the unmyelinated fibers play a role in the tonic inhibition of the medullary vasomotor centers, especially in the presence of hypertension, the morphological differences observed in the ADN from SHR may account, at least in part, for the blunted baroreflex of SHR.
peripheral nerves; electron microscopy; rat peripheral nervous system; experimental hypertension; Wistar-Kyoto rats
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
THE SPONTANEOUSLY hypertensive rat (SHR) initially bred in the Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) strain is one of the most widely studied animal models of spontaneous hypertension (12, 13, 24). Hypertension in SHR develops initially without any obvious organic lesions, with hemodynamic alterations due to increased peripheral vascular resistance later associated with various cardiovascular complications. These facts suggest that this spontaneous hypertension may be similar to the essential hypertension occurring in man (22, 23).
Baroreceptor function is known to be altered in SHR (1, 3, 17, 18). Alterations of the vascular wall where the baroreceptors are located (17), as well as physiological alterations of the afferent components of the baroreflex in SHR, have been well documented (5, 14, 17, 18). Morphological reports about SHR and WKY baroreceptor endings at the carotid (25) or aortic (11) level did not show differences, supporting the notion that there is no degeneration of baroreceptor terminals in SHR. Nevertheless, morphological studies of the aortic depressor nerve (ADN) myelinated fibers of adult SHR with well-established hypertension showed that there are morphometric differences in these fast conducting fibers compared with those of normotensive control WKY rats (5).
Because there is no report on the detailed morphometric characteristics of the unmyelinated fibers of the ADN of either strain, the objective of the present study was to examine the characteristics of the unmyelinated fibers of the ADN of SHR and to compare their morphometric parameters with those of normotensive control WKY rats.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experiments were performed on adult male and female SHR (n = 9) with well-established hypertension (>24 wk old) and age-matched WKY (n = 13) weighing 250-400 g that were anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (Nembutal, 40 mg/kg ip). The left ADN, when presented as a separate strand (in ~30% of the animals for both strains), was carefully isolated from the connective tissue and placed on a bipolar stainless steel electrode, and electrical activity was recorded to ascertain that the nerves studied morphologically were baroreceptor nerves (5). The electrophysiological parameters of the nerves studied here have been previously described and discussed (5).
After the electroneurographic recording, the proximal segment (close to the nodose ganglion) of the ADN was cut and marked with a thread, ~20 mm of the nerve were removed, and proximal and distal (close to the aorta) segments of the nerves were prepared for transmission electron microscopic study as described previously (5, 6). The unmyelinated fibers were studied under a transmission electron microscope (Hitachi-7000). Thin sections (30-50 nm) were mounted on 200-mesh copper grids and stained with lead citrate and uranyl acetate. One micrograph of the whole nerve and at least three micrographs for SHR nerves and five micrographs for WKY nerves at 5,000 times the original magnification were obtained randomly for each nerve without overlap of microscopic fields. The negatives obtained were scanned with the use of the Imapro QCS0-3200 flatbed scanner, and the images were stored on a Power Macintosh for later analysis. The area and diameter of each unmyelinated fiber inside the fascicles were measured with image analysis software (KS-400, Kontron 2.0; Eching Bei München, Germany). The density of the unmyelinated fibers was calculated, and the total number of unmyelinated fibers was inferred on the basis of the density results. The total number of fibers (myelinated and unmyelinated) was obtained, and total fiber density was also calculated. The ratio of unmyelinated to myelinated fibers was obtained. The percentage of the total fascicular area occupied by the unmyelinated fibers and by both types of fibers (myelinated and unmyelinated) was also calculated. The number of Schwann cell nuclei present in each transverse section of the depressor nerve was counted and their density calculated. The number of unmyelinated axons associated with each Schwann cell or portion thereof (hereafter called a Schwann cell unit) was determined in seven WKY and five SHR nerves as previously described (6).
Histograms of the size distribution of the unmyelinated fibers were constructed and separated into class intervals increasing by 0.1 µm.
Morphometric parameters were compared by nonparametric tests as described previously (5). Differences were considered significant if P < 0.05.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Number and size of fibers. WKY depressor nerves were found to contain, on average, 335 ± 68 (80% of the total) unmyelinated fibers proximally and 337 ± 46 (82% of the total) distally. The SHR nerves contained, on average, 130 ± 14 (64% of the total) unmyelinated fibers proximally and 242 ± 77 (76% of the total) distally. The total number of fibers was 418 ± 65 proximally and 410 ± 43 distally for WKY nerves. For SHR nerves, the total number of fibers was 203 ± 14 proximally and 316 ± 83 distally. There was no significant difference between segments for either group of animals. When the data for SHR and WKY were compared, WKY nerves were found to have a larger total number of fibers (P = 0.001) and a larger number of unmyelinated fibers (P = 0.007). The total density of fibers in WKY nerves was 244 ± 41 fibers/mm2 of nerve, and the unmyelinated fiber density was 200 ± 43 fibers/mm2 of nerve. For SHR nerves, the total density was 175 ± 15 fibers/mm2 of nerve, and the unmyelinated fiber density was 118 ± 18 fibers/mm2 of nerve. Statistical analysis showed no difference in total fiber density or unmyelinated fiber density when segments (proximal vs. distal) and groups (WKY vs. SHR) were compared. The ratios of unmyelinated to myelinated fibers were 6 ± 2 for WKY nerves and 3 ± 1 for SHR nerves, with no statistically significant differences between segments or groups.
The overall population of unmyelinated fibers for both strains had a unimodal size distribution (Fig. 1). The mean diameter of unmyelinated fibers was 0.7 ± 0.01 µm for both nerve segments in WKY rats and 0.6 ± 0.01 µm for both segments in SHR, and this difference was statistically significant. Unmyelinated axons as small as 0.2 µm and as large as 1.5 µm were present in all SHR nerves, whereas for WKY nerves, the smallest axon was 0.3 µm and the largest one was 2.0 µm in diameter. About 72% of the unmyelinated fibers of WKY nerves and 86% of the unmyelinated fibers of SHR nerves were smaller than 0.8 µm, and 19% of the WKY and only 8% of the SHR nerve unmyelinated fibers were larger than 1.0 µm in diameter. The size distribution of the unmyelinated axons showed a considerable overlap with the corresponding distribution of myelinated axons (5), and the largest WKY unmyelinated axons (2.0 µm) were larger than 77% of the myelinated axons. For SHR nerves, the largest unmyelinated axons (1.6 µm) were larger than 70% of the myelinated axons.
|
Schwann cells.
An average of 46 ± 3 Schwann cell units were found in each WKY
and SHR nerve cross section. Each Schwann cell enveloped 1-10 or
more unmyelinated axons, with an average of 3.3 ± 0.6 and
1.8 ± 0.1 axons/unit for WKY and SHR nerves, respectively. No
Schwann cell was devoid of axons. An average of 39 ± 6% of the
unmyelinated axons were not accompanied by other axons in their Schwann
cell envelopment in WKY nerves (Fig. 2).
For SHR nerves, 59 ± 4% of the unmyelinated axons were present
in single Schwann cell units (Fig. 2). For both strains, all axon sizes
were represented in single Schwann cell units, but the larger ones
predominated. When the same Schwann cell enveloped two or more axons,
the axons were not in contact with each other. Instead, each axon was
located in a separate Schwann cell trough. An average of 19 ± 3 and 22 ± 3% unmyelinated axons of WKY rats and SHR,
respectively, were enveloped in groups of two, and smaller proportions
of axons were enveloped in larger groups. The same Schwann cell often
enveloped axons of different sizes. In each proximal or distal segment
of the WKY nerve, there were, on average, 11 ± 1 Schwann cell
nuclei (6 ± 0.5 cell/mm2 of fascicular area). For SHR
nerves, proximal segments had an average of 10 ± 2 Schwann cell
nuclei (7 ± 1 cell/mm2 of nerve), and distal segments
had an average of 14 ± 2 Schwann cell nuclei (11 ± 1 cell/mm2 of nerve), attaining a significant difference.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Information about the number of unmyelinated fibers of the ADN in WKY and SHR was first reported by Andresen et al. (2). These authors studied only the distal segment of the nerve (close to the aorta) and found no significant differences either between number of fibers or in ratio between unmyelinated and myelinated fibers. Their results differ from ours, because we observed a larger number of unmyelinated fibers in the ADN of WKY rats in both proximal and distal segments. These differences might be ascribed to animal age differences and to a different methodological approach to nerve preparation, such as different buffers and fixative solution, different staining methods, and visual inspection for counting fibers. Although there was a wide variability in the data reported by Andresen et al. (2) compared with ours, their results showed a greater variability for SHR when compared with WKY rats, and this result is in agreement with our previous (5) and present studies. Our previous report of the number of myelinated fibers of WKY and SHR did not show differences between the two strains (5), but in the present study, differences were found in the total number of fibers and were attributed to the difference in the number of unmyelinated fibers. The total number of ADN fibers for Wistar rats (438 fibers) as well the percentage of the unmyelinated fibers (81%) described previously (6) are comparable with the numbers obtained here for WKY but differ from those obtained for SHR.
There is no report about the size distribution of the unmyelinated fibers of WKY and SHR. Brown et al. (3) reported that the unmyelinated fibers of the ADN of Wistar-Lewis rats vary from 0.25 to 0.9 µm in diameter. Our previous report showed that the ADN of Wistar rats have unmyelinated fibers with an average diameter of 0.5 ± 0.1 µm, with unimodal distribution (6). In the present study, a unimodal distribution of the unmyelinated fibers for SHR and WKY was found, and the statistical analysis showed that the unmyelinated fibers of the ADN of SHR have smaller diameters than those from WKY. The unimodal distribution for unmyelinated fibers in peripheral nerves is considered a normal feature (8, 15), whereas a bimodal distribution has been described in pathological conditions (20). Although there was a difference between strains in the number of unmyelinated fibers, the comparison of the unmyelinated fiber density of the ADN of WKY rats and SHR did not show a significant difference. This is due to the fact that the ADN of SHR are generally smaller compared with WKY (5).
The ratio between unmyelinated and myelinated fibers is considered ideal when it is equal to a minimum of 3:1 (7, 15). The unmyelinated-to-myelinated fiber ratio was 6:1 for WKY, whereas it was closer to the minimum normal value (3:1) for SHR. Taking into account these parameters, our results differ considerably from those obtained by Andresen et al. (2), who found a 10:1 ratio for both strains, but with wider variability (standard errors >35%). These differences might be due to the small number of animals examined in that study, i.e., five animals. In the present study, the variability observed with 9 SHR and 13 WKY rats was considerably smaller (standard errors of <25%).
Measurement of the conduction velocity of ADN unmyelinated fibers indicated a speed of 0.5-2 m/s (3, 4). In the present study, we did not measure the conduction velocity of the depressor nerves, but, using the scaling factor of Gasser (8) for calculating the conduction velocity of unmyelinated fibers in meters per second (1.7 times the axonal diameter), we calculated that WKY unmyelinated fibers conduct at 0.3-3.4 m/s, whereas those of SHR conduct at 0.3-2.5 m/s. These data suggest that the unmyelinated fibers from SHR might be conducting baroreceptor impulses to the central nervous system more slowly than in the WKY rats.
Thorén et al. (21) investigated the electrophysiological characteristics of the unmyelinated fibers of the ADN of rats and found that the discharges during normotension are sparse, especially from those with irregular activity. The authors concluded that these fibers contribute significantly to the inhibition of the vasomotor medullary centers. Gonzalez et al. (9) and Ohta and Talman (16) showed that the pressor response to electric stimulation of the ADN under anesthesia was reduced in SHR compared with WKY. Hence, the authors suggested that this attenuation could be due to differences in afferent fibers. Our data show a smaller number and a smaller diameter of unmyelinated fibers for the ADN of SHR, providing an anatomical basis to explain, at least in part, the blunted baroreflex of SHR.
Takeda et al. (19) studied the ADN function of SHR by means of ADN deafferentation, providing evidence of a reduced sympathoinhibitory response to the elevation of blood pressure caused by phenylephrine infusion. They suggested that an impaired afference of the baroreflex may contribute to the development of hypertension in the SHR. Another possible mechanism to explain the development of hypertension in SHR is an augmented sympathetic activity in these animals. Because the unmyelinated fibers play a role in the tonic inhibition of the medullary vasomotor centers, especially in the presence of hypertension (21), we may speculate that a reduced number of unmyelinated fibers in SHR depressor nerves could play a role in the sympathetic hyperactivity shown by these animals. Although Judy and Farrel (10) have suggested that the sympathetic hyperactivity of the SHR may be associated with activation of a higher central nervous system excitatory center that is additive to the medullary sympathetic outflow, the results of Gonzalez et al. (9) in decerebrate rat indicate that the influence of hypothalamus and other higher central nervous system structures is not necessary for increased sympathetic activity in the SHR.
In conclusion, the morphological differences observed in the ADN from SHR compared with those from WKY rats may account, at least in part, for the decreased baroreceptor sensitivity observed in this chronic hypertensive model.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Jaci A. Castania and Maria Cristina Lopes for technical support. We also thank the Central Microscopy Research Facility, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, for excellent technical assistance. We are grateful to Geraldo Cássio dos Reis for statistical analysis.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
This study was supported by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento do Ensino Superior, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Fundação de Apoio ao Ensino, Pesquisa e Assistência do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa, and PRONEX I.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: A. A. Barreira, Departamento de Neurologia, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto (USP), Av. Bandeirantes 3900, 14049-900, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil (E-mail: aabarrei{at}fmrp.usp.br).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 22 June 2000; accepted in final form 20 November 2000.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Andresen, MC,
and
Brown AM.
Baroreceptor function in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Effect of preventing hypertension.
Circ Res
47:
829-834,
1980
2.
Andresen, MC,
Krauhs JM,
and
Brown AM.
Relationship of aortic wall and baroreceptor properties during development in normotensive and spontaneously hypertensive rats.
Circ Res
43:
728-738,
1978
3.
Brown, AM,
Saum WR,
and
Tuley FH.
A comparison of aortic baroreceptor discharge in normotensive and spontaneously hypertensive rats.
Circ Res
39:
488-496,
1976
4.
Fan, W,
and
Andresen MC.
Differential frequency-dependent reflex integration of myelinated and nonmyelinated rat aortic baroreceptors.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
275:
H632-H640,
1998
5.
Fazan, VPS,
Fazan R, Jr,
Salgado HC,
and
Barreira AA.
Morphology of aortic depressor nerve myelinated fibers in normotensive Wistar-Kyoto and spontaneously hypertensive rats.
J Auton Nerv Syst
77:
133-139,
1999.
6.
Fazan, VPS,
Salgado HC,
and
Barreira AA.
A descriptive and quantitative light and electron microscopy study of the aortic depressor nerve in normotensive rats.
Hypertension
30:
693-698,
1997
7.
Friede, RL,
and
Beuche W.
Combined scatter diagrams of sheath thickness and fiber calibre in human sural nerves: changes with age and neuropathy.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry
48:
749-756,
1985
8.
Gasser, HS.
Properties of dorsal root unmedullated fibers on the two sides of the ganglion.
J Gen Physiol
38:
709-728,
1955
9.
Gonzalez, ER,
Krieger AJ,
and
Sapru HN.
Central resetting of baroreflex in the spontaneously hypertensive rat.
Hypertension
5:
346-352,
1983
10.
Judy, WV,
and
Farrel SK.
Arterial baroreceptor control of sympathetic nerve activity in the spontaneously hypertensive rat.
Hypertension
1:
605-614,
1979
11.
Krauhs, JM.
Structure of rat aortic baroreceptors and their relationship to connective tissue.
J Neurocytol
8:
401-414,
1979[ISI][Medline].
12.
Kurtz, TW,
and
Morris RC, Jr.
Biological variability in Wistar-Kyoto rats. Implications for research with the spontaneously hypertensive rat.
Hypertension
10:
127-131,
1987
13.
Louis, WJ,
and
Howes LG.
Genealogy of the spontaneously hypertensive rat and Wistar-Kyoto rat strains: implications for studies of inherited hypertension.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol
16, Suppl 7:
S1-S5,
1990.
14.
Nosaka, S,
and
Okamoto K.
Modified characteristics of the aortic baroreceptor activities in the spontaneously hypertensive rat.
Jpn Circ J
34:
68S-69S,
1970.
15.
Ochoa, J,
and
Mair WGP
The normal sural nerve in man. I. Ultrastructure and numbers of fibers and cells.
Acta Neuropathol (Berl)
13:
197-216,
1969[Medline].
16.
Ohta, H,
and
Talman WT.
Alteration of baroreceptor and chemoreceptor reflexes in spontaneously hypertensive rats.
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol
1, Suppl:
S60-S61,
1995.
17.
Sapru, HN,
and
Krieger AJ.
Role of receptor elements in baroreceptor resetting.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
236:
H174-H182,
1979.
18.
Sapru, HN,
and
Wang SC.
Modification of aortic baroreceptor resetting in the spontaneously hypertensive rat.
Am J Physiol
230:
664-674,
1976.
19.
Takeda, K,
Hayashi J,
Itoh H,
Hirata M,
Nakata T,
Oguro M,
Kawasaki S,
Sasaki S,
and
Nakagawa M.
Transection of aortic depressor nerve fails to raise blood pressure in spontaneously hypertensive rats.
Cardiovasc Res
23:
573-576,
1989[ISI][Medline].
20.
Thomas, PK,
and
Ochoa J.
Microscopic anatomy of peripheral nerve fibers.
In: Peripheral Neuropathy, edited by Dyck PJ,
Thomas PK,
Lambert EH,
and Bunge R.. New York: Saunders, 1984, p. 39-96.
21.
Thorén, P,
Saum WR,
and
Brown AM.
Characteristics of rat aortic baroreceptors with nonmedullated afferent nerve fibers.
Circ Res
40:
231-237,
1977
22.
Trippodo, NC,
and
Frohlich ED.
Similarities of genetic (spontaneous) hypertension. Man and rat.
Circ Res
48:
309-319,
1981
23.
Yamori, Y.
Pathogenesis of spontaneous hypertension as a model for essential hypertension.
Jpn Circ J
41:
259-266,
1977[Medline].
24.
Yamori, Y.
Implication of hypertensive rat models for primordial nutritional prevention of cardiovascular diseases.
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol
26:
568-572,
1999[ISI][Medline].
25.
Yates, RD,
Chen I-,
and
Li
An electron microscopic study of the baroreceptors in the internal carotid artery of the spontaneously hypertensive rat.
Cell Tissue Res
205:
473-483,
1980[ISI][Medline].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. C. Salgado, A. R. Barale, J. A. Castania, B. H. Machado, M. W. Chapleau, and R. Fazan Jr. Baroreflex responses to electrical stimulation of aortic depressor nerve in conscious SHR Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2007; 292(1): H593 - H600. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. B. Genari, H. C. Salgado, and V. P. S. Fazan Microscopic anatomy of the recurrent laryngeal nerve in male and female Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats FASEB J, March 1, 2006; 20(5): A880 - A881. |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |