AJP - Heart AJP citation statistics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 279: H35-H46, 2000;
0363-6135/00 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (49)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xiao, Y.-F.
Right arrow Articles by Leaf, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Xiao, Y.-F.
Right arrow Articles by Leaf, A.
Vol. 279, Issue 1, H35-H46, July 2000

Coexpression with beta 1-subunit modifies the kinetics and fatty acid block of hH1alpha Na+ channels

Yong-Fu Xiao1,2,4, Sterling N. Wright5, Ging Kuo Wang3,4, James P. Morgan1,4, and Alexander Leaf2,4

1 Charles A. Dana Research Institute and Harvard-Thorndike Laboratory, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 2 Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, and 3 Department of Anesthesia, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 4 Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02215; and 5 Department of Biological Sciences, Murray State University, Murray, Kentucky 42071


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Voltage-gated cardiac Na+ channels are composed of alpha - and beta 1-subunits. In this study beta 1-subunit was cotransfected with the alpha -subunit of the human cardiac Na+ channel (hH1alpha ) in human embryonic kidney (HEK293t) cells. The effects of this coexpression on the kinetics and fatty acid-induced suppression of Na+ currents were assessed. Current density was significantly greater in HEK293t cells coexpressing alpha - and beta 1-subunits (INa,alpha beta ) than in HEK293t cells expressing alpha -subunit alone (INa,alpha ). Compared with INa,alpha , the voltage-dependent inactivation and activation of INa,alpha beta were significantly shifted in the depolarizing direction. In addition, coexpression with beta 1-subunit prolonged the duration of recovery from inactivation. Eicosapentaenoic acid [EPA, C20:5(n-3)] significantly reduced INa,alpha beta in a concentration-dependent manner and at 5 µM shifted the midpoint voltage of the steady-state inactivation by -22 ± 1 mV. EPA also significantly accelerated channel transition from the resting state to the inactivated state and prolonged the recovery time from inactivation. Docosahexaenoic acid [C22:6(n-3)], alpha -linolenic acid [C18:3(n-3)], and conjugated linoleic acid [C18:2(n-6)] at 5 µM significantly inhibited both INa,alpha beta and INa,alpha . In contrast, saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids had no effects on INa,alpha beta . This finding differs from the results for INa,alpha , which was significantly inhibited by both saturated and unsaturated fatty acids. Our data demonstrate that functional association of beta 1-subunit with hH1alpha modifies the kinetics and fatty acid block of the Na+ channel.

alpha -subunit; cardiac sodium ion channel; polyunsaturated fatty acids


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

SEVERAL CLINICAL STUDIES suggest that diets containing long-chain n-3 fatty acids significantly reduce the incidence of sudden death from coronary heart disease (1, 13, 14, 34, 35). A diet high in fish oil, in contrast to saturated fat or monounsaturated olive oil, prevented ventricular fibrillation induced by coronary artery ligation in rats and increased the electrical ventricular fibrillation thresholds in marmosets (27, 28). Furthermore, an intravenous infusion of an emulsion, largely eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid [DHA, C22:6(n-3)], prevented ischemia-induced ventricular fibrillation in dogs (7, 8). Previous data (21) indicate that polyunsaturated long-chain fatty acids (PUFAs) reduced electrical excitability of rat cardiac myocytes by increasing the depolarizing current required to elicit an action potential and by markedly prolonging the relative refractory period. Activation of voltage-dependent Na+ channels leads to a rapid influx of Na+ and initiates an action potential in most cardiac myocytes. Extracellular application of free PUFAs significantly suppressed Na+ currents (INa,rat) and shifted the steady-state inactivation to more hyperpolarized potentials in cultured neonatal rat cardiomyocytes (41). PUFAs also inhibit Ca2+ (40) and K+ currents (9) in mammalian heart cells. These effects of PUFAs on ion channels may be critical for their antiarrhythmic action in vivo.

It is recognized that the human cardiac Na+ channel consists of one large alpha -subunit that alone creates a functional membrane channel, which we have studied (43). In addition, there is also a small beta 1-subunit (12). The physiological consequences of beta 1-subunit modulation of the voltage-dependent Na+ channel are controversial in the literature (2, 19, 24, 25, 29, 31). Therefore, in this study we assessed the effects of coexpressing the beta 1-subunit on the kinetics of the alpha -subunit of the voltage-dependent human cardiac Na+ channel (hH1alpha ) transiently expressed in a mammalian cell line (HEK293t). We were surprised that the fatty acid specificity was lost in the alpha -subunit expressed in HEK293t cells in which monounsaturated and even saturated fatty acid had some suppressing effects on INa,alpha (43), whereas only PUFAs suppressed INa,rat in rat cardiac myocytes (41). Two further aims of this study were 1) to learn how the complete human myocardial Na+ channel (hH1alpha beta ) would be affected by the antiarrhythmic PUFAs and 2) to learn whether the addition of the beta 1-subunit to the hH1 alpha -subunit would reestablish the requirement that only PUFAs could modulate the fast voltage-dependent Na+ current in the rat.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials and solutions. Fatty acids obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO) were dissolved weekly in ethanol at 10 mM and stored under a nitrogen atmosphere at -20°C before use. The experimental concentration of fatty acids was obtained by dilution of the stocks and contained negligible ethanol, which at the dilution applied had no effect on Na+ currents. The pipette solution for recording the inward Na+ current contained (in mM) 100 CsCl, 40 CsOH, 1 MgCl2, 1 CaCl2, 11 EGTA, 10 HEPES, and 5 MgATP, pH 7.3. The bath solution contained (in mM) 60 NaCl, 40 N-methyl-D-glucamine, 10 CsCl, 1 MgCl2, 1.8 CaCl2, 10 HEPES, and 10 glucose, pH 7.4. The Tyrode solution contained (in mM) 137 NaCl, 5 KCl, 1 MgCl2, 1.8 CaCl2, 10 HEPES, and 10 glucose, pH 7.4.

Cell culture and transient transfection of Na+ channels. The method for the culture of HEK293t cells was as described previously (11). Briefly, cells were grown to 50% confluence in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 1% penicillin-streptomycin solution, 3 mM taurine, and 25 mM HEPES. Cells were split twice per week.

HEK293t cells were transfected with cloned hH1alpha Na+ channels by a calcium phosphate precipitation method in a TI-25 flask. A reporter plasmid CD8-pih3m (1 µg, cell surface antigen) and hH1alpha cDNA clone (10 µg) in the pcDNA1/amp vector (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA) were prepared in 250 mM CaCl2, added to a test tube containing 0.36 ml of Hanks' balanced salt solution (2×) (in mM: 274 NaCl, 40 HEPES, 12 dextrose, 10 KCl, and 1.4 Na2HPO4, pH 7.05), and incubated at 22°C for 20 min. The DNA solution was then dripped over a cell culture (30-50% confluence) containing 7 ml of DMEM. The transfection was satisfactory under these conditions (38). For coexpression of the rat brain beta 1-subunit with hH1alpha (hH1alpha beta , coexpression of the channel), saturating levels (>10-fold molar excess) of beta 1-subunit cDNA were used to ensure that the currents recorded were from channels composed of both alpha - and beta 1-subunits. The transfected cells were trypsinized and replated 15 h later to an appropriate density in 35-mm tissue culture dishes (which also served as recording chambers) containing 2 ml of fresh DMEM. Transfected cells were incubated at 37°C in air with 5% CO2 added and 98% relative humidity and were used within 3 days. Transfection-positive cells, which were identified by binding immunobeads (CD8-Dynabeads M-450, Dynal, Oslo, Norway) coated with a monoclonal antibody (ITI-5C2) specific for CD8 antigen, were selected for patch-clamp experiments.

Electrophysiological recordings. During an experiment HEK293t cells plated in a culture dish were continuously superfused (1-2 ml/min) with the Tyrode solution. Recording glass electrodes had a resistance of 1-3 MOmega when filled with the pipette solution and were connected via Ag-AgCl wire to an Axopatch 1D amplifier (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA). A cell coated with CD8 beads in HEK293t cells was chosen for patch-clamp study. After a conventional gigaseal was formed, the capacitance of an electrode was compensated. Additional suction was used to form the whole cell configuration. Whole cell membrane capacitance was measured by using the method described previously (42). The average membrane capacitance was 37 ± 0.8 pF (n = 179) for HEK293t cells. Correction of cell capacitance and series resistance was then performed before application of experimental voltage-clamp protocols. After the whole cell configuration was formed, the cells were dialyzed for 5-10 min before data were acquired. With our internal and external recording solutions, we found that maintaining a tight seal for a relatively long period became difficult at holding potentials more negative than -90 mV. Therefore, we held the membrane potential at -90 mV in most experiments to ensure that cells would remain stable long enough for us to examine INa,alpha beta or INa,alpha from the same cell before, during, and after exposure to fatty acids. In addition, the amplitude and current-voltage (I-V) relationship curve were not altered when INa,alpha beta or INa,alpha was elicited by pulses from a holding potential of -150 mV or from -90 mV with a 400-ms hyperpolarizing prepulse to -160 mV. Our experiments show that the 400-ms hyperpolarizing prepulse to -160 mV was sufficient to remove fast and slow inactivation. Na+ currents were activated by 10- or 20-ms test pulses. Bath solutions with or without fatty acids were rapidly exchanged by using a modified puffer-pipette system (41). Experiments were conducted at 22-23°C.

Statistics. Data from two groups were analyzed by the unpaired Student's t-test. Variance analysis (ANOVA) was used to compare the difference derived from three or more group experiments. The level for statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Data are presented as means ± SE. Depending on the experiment, some data were fit with a logistical equation, (A1 - A2)/[1 + (x/x0)p + A2], where x0 is the center, p is power, A1 is the initial y value, and A2 is the final y value. Other data were fit by either a Boltzmann equation {1/[1 + exp(V1/2 - V)/k], where V1/2 is the half-inactivation potential, V is the voltage potential, and k is the slope factor (in mV/e-fold change in current} or least-squares fitting (y = A0 + A1 expt/tau 1 + A2 expt/tau 2, where t is time and tau 1 and tau 2 are the time constants of the fast and slow components of inactivation, respectively) (Origin 4.1, Microcal Software, Northampton, MA) with a single or double exponential function.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Voltage-dependent Na+ currents in HEK293t cells transfected with hH1alpha (INa,alpha ) or hH1alpha beta (INa,alpha beta ). Voltage-gated Na+ currents with fast activation and fast inactivation kinetics were evoked by depolarizing pulses in HEK293t cells transiently transfected with hH1alpha or cotransfected with hH1alpha and beta 1-subunit (Fig. 1A). Functional association of beta 1-subunit with hH1alpha significantly enhanced the peak current densities (Fig. 1B). The current densities (elicited by voltage pulses from -150 to -30 mV) were -74 ± 8 pA/pF for INa,alpha (n = 27) and -106 ± 9 pA/pF for INa,alpha beta (n = 39, P < 0.05; Fig. 1B), respectively. Compared with the current densities of -68 ± 7, -17 ± 3, and 0 ± 0 pA/pF for INa,alpha (n = 27) elicited by the corresponding voltage commands from -120, -90, and -70 mV to -30 mV, the corresponding values of INa,alpha beta (n = 39) were -105 ± 9, -85 ± 9, and -25 ± 5 pA/pF (Fig. 1B). Whereas >80% of peak INa,alpha beta was elicited by pulses from -90 to -30 mV, the same voltage step evoked only 18% of peak INa,alpha . In addition, a considerable amount of INa,alpha beta (23%) was activated by voltage pulses from -70 to -30 mV, but no INa,alpha was evoked with the same voltage protocol (Fig. 1A). These results indicate that coexpression of beta 1-subunit modifies the voltage-dependent availability of Na+ channels.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Voltage-dependent activation of human cardiac Na+ currents (hH1). A: current traces were evoked by depolarizing voltage pulses from -150, -120, -90, and -70 mV to -30 mV (see protocols at top) for the complete hH1alpha beta (alpha  + beta 1) and hH1alpha (alpha ). Note that no current was elicited by a pulse from -70 to -30 mV in a HEK293t cell expressing hH1alpha only. B: averaged peak current densities evoked by voltage pulses from different holding potentials. I, current. *P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.

Modification of channel activation and inactivation by the beta 1-subunit. Figure 2A shows the original current traces, and Fig. 2B shows the I-V relationship of the voltage-dependent activation of hH1alpha beta and hH1alpha . Na+ currents were activated at around -60 mV and reached the maximal amplitude at -30 mV for both INa,alpha beta (n = 7) and INa,alpha (n = 6). Although the general shape of the I-V relationship did not change, the midpoint of the normalized I-V curve (from -60 to -30 mV) for INa,alpha beta had an ~10-mV shift in the positive direction. This result suggests that the beta 1-subunit may modify the activation process of hH1alpha Na+ channels. Normalized whole cell activation conductance from peak Na+ currents confirmed the modulatory effect of the beta 1-subunit on INa,alpha activation, which caused an 8-mV positive shift at V1/2 (P < 0.05, Fig. 2C). The average V1/2 and k (slope) values for the fitted functions were -42.2 ± 0.81 and 5.3 ± 0.17 mV, respectively, for INa,alpha beta and -50.1 ± 0.74 and 5.5 ± 0.56 mV, respectively, for INa,alpha .


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Effects of coexpression of beta 1-subunits on the activation and inactivation of Na+ current in HEK293t cells. A: original current traces were recorded from HEK293t cells transfected with alpha -subunit alone (INa,alpha ) or cotransfected with alpha - and beta 1-subunits (INa,alpha beta ). Top: voltage protocol used for the activation of currents. After 400-ms hyperpolarizing pulses to -160 mV, Na+ currents were elicited by 10-ms test pulses from -90 to 50 mV with 5-mV increments. The membrane potential was held at -90 mV, and the pulse rate is 0.2 Hz. B: current-voltage relationships for INa,alpha (alpha , n = 6) and INa,alpha beta (alpha  + beta 1, n = 7) were normalized to their own maximal peak current. V, voltage. C: relative whole cell activation conductances for INa,alpha and INa,alpha beta . D: normalized fast steady-state inactivation was averaged for INa,alpha (n = 9) and INa,alpha beta (n = 6). Currents were elicited by 10-ms test pulses to -30 mV following 500-ms conditional prepulses varying from -160 to -10 mV in 10-mV increments every 10 s. The membrane potential of the cells was held at -90 mV. Data were fit with a Boltzmann equation.

The effects of the beta 1-subunit on the fast steady-state inactivation were examined by measuring the amplitude of peak currents evoked by a two-pulse protocol. From a holding potential of -90 mV, we delivered 500-ms prepulses ranging from -160 to -10 mV (in 5-mV increments) and then measured the available current elicited by a 10-ms pulse to -30 mV. The average V1/2 of the fast steady-state inactivation curve of INa,alpha was -97 ± 2.3 mV with a k value of 6.7 ± 0.8 mV (n = 6). In contrast, coexpression of hH1alpha with beta 1-subunit caused a 22 ± 0.7 mV shift of the V1/2 of INa,alpha beta , which was -75 ± 2.7 mV with a k value of 5.5 ± 0.5 mV (n = 9, P < 0.001; Fig. 2D). In another series of experiments (data not shown), we used a protocol similar to that of Bendahhou and colleagues (4) to examine the effects of beta 1-subunit coexpression on the slow steady-state inactivation. We used 45-s conditioning pulses ranging from -140 to 10 mV (in 10-mV increments) followed by a 100-ms recovery pulse to -120 mV and a subsequent 10-ms test pulse to -30 mV. We found that the V1/2 values for the slow inactivation curves of INa,alpha (-62.7 ± 1.9 mV, n = 7) and INa,alpha beta (-62.0 ± 2.1 mV, n = 6) were not significantly different (P > 0.05). These results suggest that functional association of beta 1-subunit with hH1alpha causes a significant shift of the fast steady-state inactivation but does not markedly affect the slow steady-state inactivation.

Coexpression of beta 1-subunit with hH1alpha slows the recovery from inactivation. Voltage-activated cardiac Na+ channels may directly transit from the resting state to the inactivated state without opening of the channel. This process of inactivation is referred to as resting inactivation (6, 15, 18, 22, 33). To assess the effects of beta 1-subunit coexpression on the development of resting inactivation of hH1alpha Na+ channels, a conditioning pulse to -65 mV with variable durations was followed by a 10-ms test pulse to -30 mV (Fig. 3A). We selected -65 mV as the conditioning voltage because the depolarization was large enough to ensure that the inactivation of both INa,alpha beta and INa,alpha neared completion but small enough to ensure that the channels did not open. Figure 3B shows that the amplitudes of INa,alpha beta and INa,alpha dramatically decreased as the duration (Delta t) of conditioning pulses was prolonged, indicating that an increasing proportion of channels entered the inactivated state. The decay time constant of inactivation development was 26.2 ± 3.6 ms for INa,alpha (n = 6) and 32.2 ± 4.2 ms for INa,alpha beta (n = 7) (Fig. 3B). Our results indicate that coexpression of the beta 1-subunit with hH1alpha does not significantly (P > 0.05) alter the development of inactivation.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Effects of coexpression of beta 1-subunits on development of resting inactivation and recovery from inactivation. A: the pulse protocol was composed of a depolarizing pulse from -150 to -65 mV with various duration, followed by a 10-ms test pulse to -30 mV. The membrane potential was held at -150 mV with a pulse rate of 0.2 Hz. B: prolonging the time of prepulse reduced the normalized current amplitude for hH1alpha (alpha , n = 6) and hH1alpha beta (alpha  + beta 1, n = 7). Data were fit with a single exponential function. C: experimental protocol. The pulse protocol was composed of a 10-s depolarizing pulse from -120 to -65 mV, followed by a hyperpolarizing pulse to -140 mV with progressively longer durations and then a 10-ms test pulse to -30 mV. The membrane holding potential was -120 mV, and the rate of pulse was 0.1 Hz. D: time course of recovery of peak INa,alpha (alpha , n = 6) and INa,alpha beta (alpha  + beta 1, n = 8) from inactivation. Data were fit by a double exponential function. Because recovery of Na+ currents from inactivation occurred very fast, the inset expands the initial portion, the first 100 ms, of the recovery, which was slower for INa,alpha beta (alpha  + beta 1) than for INa,alpha (alpha ).

To determine whether coexpression of the beta 1-subunit affected the recovery from inactivation, a double-pulse protocol was used to test the recovery from resting inactivation at -65 mV. A 10-s depolarizing conditioning pulse to -65 mV was followed by a variable recovery interval at -140 mV and then a subsequent test pulse to -30 mV (Fig. 3C). The 10-s conditional pulse to -65 mV failed to elicit channel opening but ensured that Na+ channels entered the inactivated state. The time course of recovery from inactivation of both INa,alpha beta and INa,alpha was well fit by a double exponential function (Fig. 3D). For INa,alpha (n = 6), tau 1 was 2.1 ± 0.3 ms (A1 = -0.73) and tau 2 was 232 ± 78 ms (A2 = -0.27). For INa,alpha beta (n = 8), tau 1 was 10.6 ± 2.1 ms (A1 = -0.69) and tau 2 was 698 ± 275 ms (A2 = -0.31), respectively. The values of tau 1 and tau 2 between INa,alpha and INa,alpha beta were significantly different (P < 0.05, Fig. 3D).

To more carefully examine the recovery time course of the fast component, we used a pulse protocol similar to that shown in Fig. 3C. We delivered a 400-ms conditioning pulse to -65 mV and a recovery pulse to -140 mV with 1-ms increments (Delta t) to 30 ms, as well as a 10-ms test pulse to -30 mV. The data fit well with a single, but not a double, exponential function for both INa,alpha and INa,alpha beta . The time constants were 3.56 ± 0.14 and 5.11 ± 0.22 ms for INa,alpha (n = 14) and INa,alpha beta (n = 8, P < 0.05), respectively. We tested four recovery potentials, -100, -120, -140, and -160 mV. The recovery rate for both channels became more rapid when more negative potentials were used, but the difference in recovery rate between INa,alpha and INa,alpha beta remained significant. These data suggest that beta 1-subunit modifies the inactivation kinetics of hH1alpha channels by slowing the recovery from both fast and slow inactivation.

Voltage- and concentration-dependent suppression of INa,alpha beta by EPA. It has been reported that coexpression with the beta 1-subunit reduced the affinity of resting channels to lidocaine by a factor of two in oocytes (24). In a recent study (39), we showed that coexpression of hH1alpha with the beta 1-subunit elicited a positive shift in state-dependent cocaine block of the Na+ channel. In another study (41, 43), we demonstrated that INa,alpha was more sensitive to EPA than was INa,rat. To determine whether coexpression with the beta 1-subunit had an effect on EPA block of hH1 channels similar to that observed in local anesthetic experiments and to determine whether the different sensitivity to PUFAs between INa,alpha and INa,rat might result from a lack of the beta 1-subunit, experiments were designed to look at the effects of EPA on INa,alpha beta . The inhibition of INa,alpha beta initiated within 20 s and reached the maximal effect within 3 min after application of 5 µM EPA. INa,alpha beta returned toward the pretreatment level after washout of EPA with 0.2% fatty acid-free BSA solution. Figure 4 shows a voltage-dependent inhibition. The original current traces of INa,alpha beta were evoked by single-step pulses from -150, -120, -90, and -70 mV to -30 mV in the absence (control) and presence (EPA) of 5 µM EPA (Fig. 4A). The reduction of INa,alpha beta caused by 5 µM EPA at all of the tested voltage steps is statistically significant (n = 15, P < 0.001; Fig. 4B). In hH1alpha , EPA (5 µM) inhibited INa,alpha , evoked by a single-step voltage command from -150, -120, or -90 mV to -30 mV, by 67 ± 6, 82 ± 5, or 97 ± 1% (n = 15), respectively. Coexpression with the beta 1-subunit decreased the degree of block by 5 µM EPA, because with the same voltage steps INa,alpha beta was inhibited by 50 ± 5, 61 ± 5, or 90 ± 4% (n = 15), respectively. The inhibition is more profound at pulses from -90 to -30 mV. This result suggests that the EPA-induced suppression of INa,alpha beta is voltage dependent.


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Voltage-dependent suppression of INa,alpha beta by extracellular application of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA). A: original current traces of INa,alpha beta in the absence (control) and presence (EPA) of 5 µM EPA were evoked by depolarizing pulses from -150, -120, -90, and -70 mV to -30 mV (see protocols at top). B: extracellular application of 5 µM EPA significantly reduced peak INa,alpha beta densities (n = 15). ***P < 0.001. C: normalized voltage-dependent suppression of INa,alpha beta by 5 µM EPA (n = 15).

The suppression of INa,alpha beta by EPA was concentration dependent. Figure 5 shows the inhibitory effects of EPA on INa,alpha beta and INa,alpha . Currents were elicited by single-step pulses from -120 to -30 mV every 5 s. The IC50 values of EPA were 3.9 ± 0.3 and 0.51 ± 0.06 µM for INa,alpha beta and INa,alpha , respectively. These data indicate that functional association of the beta 1-subunit with hH1alpha reduces the apparent affinity of the channel for EPA 7.6-fold compared with expression of the alpha -subunit alone. The data in Figs. 4 and 5 suggest that coexpression of the beta 1-subunit with hH1alpha reduces the channel sensitivity to EPA and that the change in the effectiveness of EPA may be related to the beta 1-subunit-induced shift of the steady-state inactivation.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Concentration-dependent suppression of cardiac Na+ currents by EPA. EPA-induced suppression of INa,alpha (alpha ) and INa,alpha beta (alpha  + beta 1) is concentration dependent. Each data point represents the average value of at least 6 individual cells. After a hyperpolarizing pulse to -150 mV for 400 ms, a 10-ms test pulse to -30 mV was applied to activate the Na+ current. The membrane holding potential was -90 mV, and the rate of pulses was 0.1 Hz.

Effects of EPA on activation and inactivation of INa,alpha beta . EPA (5 µM) block of INa,alpha beta did not alter the I-V relationship, but the decrease in amplitude of INa,alpha beta in the presence of 5 µM EPA was significantly different at the voltages from -40 to 30 mV (Fig. 6A, n = 7). The Na+ current was activated at -60 mV and achieved its maximal amplitude at -30 mV in either the absence or presence of 5 µM EPA. The inhibition was reversible after washout of EPA with the bath solution containing 0.2% BSA (data not shown). The activation curves calculated from normalized conductance were superimposed in the absence and presence of 5 µM EPA (n = 7, Fig. 6B). The 50% channel activation was at -42.2 ± 0.81 mV with a k value of 5.3 ± 0.17 mV for control and at -41.5 ± 0.21 mV with a k value of 6.0 ± 0.15 mV for 5 µM EPA.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Effects of EPA on activation and inactivation of INa,alpha beta . A: normalized current-voltage relationships in the absence (control) and presence (EPA, n = 8) of 5 µM EPA. Na+ currents were evoked by the same voltage protocol shown in Fig. 2A. B: relative whole cell activation conductance in the absence (control) and presence (EPA) of 5 µM EPA. The midpoint voltage (V1/2) of activation was -42.2 ± 0.81 mV with a slope factor of 5.3 ± 0.17 mV for control and -41.5 ± 0.21 mV with a slope of 6.0 ± 0.15 mV for EPA, respectively. C: effects of EPA on the normalized steady-state inactivation of INa,alpha beta (n = 7) in the absence (control) and presence (EPA) of 5 µM EPA as well as during washout. Na+ currents were evoked by the same protocol shown in Fig. 2C. Data in B and C were fit by a Boltzmann equation.

Figure 6C shows the effects of 5 µM EPA on the steady-state inactivation of INa,alpha beta in HEK293t cells. The membrane potential of the cells was held at -90 mV. Currents were elicited with a double-pulse protocol, which consisted of a 500-ms prepulse and a 10-ms test pulse to -30 mV. The prepulses varied from -160 to -50 mV in 5-mV increments with a stimulatory rate of 0.1 Hz. Bath perfusion of 5 µM EPA solution significantly suppressed INa,alpha beta . The current was almost completely inhibited when the prepulses were more positive than -70 mV in the presence of EPA. The V1/2 of the normalized steady-state inactivation curve of INa,alpha beta was significantly shifted to the negative direction, from -74.8 ± 0.3 mV (k = 5.7 ± 0.23 mV) to -97.5 ± 0.3 mV (k = 9.0 ± 0.32 mV, n = 7, P < 0.001) in the absence and the presence of 5 µM EPA, respectively. After washout of EPA with 0.2% fatty acid-free BSA, the steady-state inactivation curve was shifted back to -81.9 ± 0.4 mV at the V1/2 point with a k value of 6.9 ± 0.34 mV. The values of the V1/2 of the steady-state inactivation curves between control and washout were not significantly different (P > 0.05), but the difference between EPA and washout was statistically significant (P < 0.01).

EPA-induced acceleration of inactivation development. To assess the effects of EPA on the development of resting inactivation of INa,alpha beta , conditioning pulses to -65 mV with increasing durations were followed by a test pulse to -30 mV (Fig. 7A). Because the conditioning pulses to -65 mV did not evoke any current (Fig. 2), the development of inactivation proceeded directly from the resting or preactivated states. Figure 7B shows that increases in duration of the conditioning pulse gradually increased the population of hH1alpha beta channels into the inactivated state. EPA at 5 µM significantly accelerated the process of this transition. The data were well fit by a single exponential decay with a time constant of 32.2 ± 0.8 and 8.3 ± 0.8 ms for control and EPA (P < 0.01), respectively. It is interesting that compared with hH1alpha alone, coexpression of the beta 1-subunit with hH1alpha reduced the rate of inactivation development in the presence of EPA (Fig. 7C). The time constant was significantly different between INa,alpha (3.6 ± 0.2 ms, n = 6) and INa,alpha beta (8.3 ± 0.8 ms, n = 7, P < 0.05; Fig. 7C). The data suggest that functional association of the beta 1-subunit with hH1alpha reduces the effects of EPA on the development of resting inactivation of cardiac Na+ channels.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Acceleration of development of resting inactivation of INa,alpha beta by EPA. A: the voltage protocol was composed of a prepulse from -150 to -65 mV with increasing durations and a 10-ms test pulse to -30 mV. B: time course of development of resting inactivation in the absence (alpha  + beta 1, control) and presence (alpha  + beta 1, EPA; n = 7) of 5 µM EPA. The time courses of resting inactivation of INa,alpha beta were fit by a single exponential function with the time constant of 32.2 ± 0.8 ms for control and 8.3 ± 0.8 ms for EPA. C: comparison of development of resting inactivation of INa,alpha (alpha ) and INa,alpha beta (alpha  + beta 1) in the presence of 5 µM EPA. The time constant (fit by a single exponential function) of development of resting inactivation of INa,alpha is 3.6 ± 0.2 ms (n = 6) in the presence of 5 µM EPA, which is significantly shorter than that of INa,alpha beta (8.3 ± 0.8 ms; n = 7, P < 0.05).

EPA slows the recovery of INa,alpha beta from inactivation. We examined the kinetics of recovery of INa,alpha beta from inactivation in the absence and presence of EPA using a protocol similar to that shown in Fig. 3C. In these experiments we used -100 mV as the holding and recovery potential. Note from Fig. 7 that 10 s at -65 mV would more than suffice to convert all Na+ channels to the inactivated state. We determined the recovery from inactivation by increasing the duration (Delta t) of recovery pulses and measuring the available current elicited by a test pulse to -30 mV. In control saline, the time course of recovery from inactivation of INa,alpha beta was fit by a double exponential function, and most of the recovery was in the fast component (Fig. 8). The time constants for the recovery from inactivation of INa,alpha beta in control saline were 9 ± 7 ms (tau 1; A1 = -0.78) and 1,149 ± 256 ms (tau 2; A2 = -0.22). In the presence of 5 µM EPA, the recovery from inactivation of INa,alpha beta was also fit with a double exponential function (Fig. 8) with the time constants of 33 ± 7 ms (tau 1; A1 = -0.65) and 5,363 ± 845 ms (tau 2; A2 = -0.35). Both tau 1 and tau 2 are significantly slower in the presence of 5 µM EPA (P < 0.05). To obtain a better view of the fast component, the x-axis was plotted to 1 s (Fig. 8, inset). At the recovery potential of -100 mV, the time required for 50% channel recovery from the fast component of inactivation was significantly delayed, from 13 ± 1 ms for control to 63 ± 7 ms for 5 µM EPA (n = 9, P < 0.01), respectively. The time required for 50% recovery from the fast component of inactivation was also significantly prolonged when the recovery potential was -150 mV, from 5.7 ± 0.6 ms for control to 21.8 ± 1.6 ms for 5 µM EPA (n = 8, P < 0.01). These results indicate that EPA slows recovery of INa,alpha beta from both the fast and slow components of inactivation.


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Kinetics of recovery from inactivation of INa,alpha beta . The time course of recovery of peak INa,alpha beta (n = 9) from inactivation is shown in the absence (control, open circle ) and presence (EPA, ) of 5 µM EPA. The testing currents were normalized to their maximal values of INa,alpha beta recorded before application of the protocol. Recovery of INa,alpha beta from inactivation was markedly delayed for both fast and slow components in the presence of EPA. Data were fit by a double exponential function. Inset: fraction of recovery from inactivation during the first 1 s for control and EPA. The voltage protocol is similar to that of Fig. 3A, but with a holding and returning potential of -100 mV.

A higher efficacy of EPA on inactivated Na+ channels. Only closed resting channels are able to open in response to a depolarizing pulse. During a cycle of depolarization and repolarization, channels are in dynamic equilibrium between the resting and inactivated states. Therefore, current amplitude is proportional to the number of channels in the resting state before a depolarizing pulse. The EPA-induced suppression of INa,alpha beta was voltage dependent (Fig. 4), and the midpoint of the steady-state inactivation of INa,alpha beta was significantly shifted to the negative direction in the presence of EPA (Fig. 6). The voltage-dependent block and the negative shift in channel availability could result from preferential EPA action on inactivated channels compared with closed resting channels (3). Therefore, we tested the effects of EPA on the resting and inactivated states of Na+ channels. Figure 9, A and B, shows that 5 µM EPA suppressed superimposed Na+ currents evoked by depolarization pulses to -30 mV from the holding potentials of -150 and -70 mV; from the latter holding potential INa,alpha beta was completely inhibited.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Effects of EPA on resting and inactivated hH1alpha beta channels. Current traces were evoked by voltage steps from -150 to -30 mV (A) and from -70 to -30 mV (B) in the absence (control) and presence (EPA) of 5 µM EPA. C: suppression of resting (open circle ) and inactivated () hH1alpha beta channels by EPA was concentration dependent. Data were fit by a logistical equation (see MATERIALS AND METHODS). Each value represents 6-15 cells (mean ± SE). Normalized current was calculated as INa,alpha beta (EPA)/INa,alpha beta (control) from the same corresponding cell.

To examine the EPA efficacy on resting channels, we assessed the EPA-induced concentration-dependent suppression of INa,alpha beta evoked by depolarization pulses from a holding potential of -150 to -30 mV (Fig. 9A). At this holding potential, virtually all channels were in the closed resting state. The concentration-dependent curve gave an estimated Kr, the equilibrium constant for drug binding or interaction with resting channels (3), of EPA at a concentration of 5.29 ± 0.56 µM (Fig. 9C).

Because inactivated channels do not open during depolarization, the effects of drug binding to the inactivated state must depend on a small portion of channels in the resting state. We therefore set the membrane holding potential at -70 mV and assessed the concentration-dependent relationship of EPA, Ki (Fig. 9, B and C). Here, Ki is the equilibrium constant for block of inactivated channels at a -70-mV holding potential at which channel inactivation was 80% (Fig. 2B). Ki measured at this holding potential was 0.02 ± 0.01 µM (Fig. 9C). Thus Na+ currents in HEK293t cells coexpressing beta 1-subunit and hH1alpha displayed a 265-fold greater sensitivity to EPA in the inactivated state than in the resting state.

EPA block of resting hH1alpha beta channels. Several Na+ channel blockers show a tonic and frequency-dependent inhibition of voltage-gated Na+ channels (32). Figure 10A shows EPA-induced inhibition of INa,alpha beta without and with predepolarizing pulses. The current was evoked by a voltage command from a holding potential of -140 mV to -30 mV every 5 s. After 10 control current traces were collected, 5 µM EPA solution was washed into the bath. Na+ currents were then recorded after 3 min of EPA perfusion. The amplitude of peak currents were elicited by a train of 30 pulses in the presence of 5 µM EPA. The amplitude of peak INa,alpha beta elicited by the first pulse of the train was markedly reduced. This inhibition is referred to as tonic block, because the block developed at a holding potential of -140 mV and without opening channels. During subsequent pulses in the train, no additional block developed. The amplitude of peak INa,alpha beta evoked by the 30th pulse was similar to the value evoked by the 1st pulse. Therefore, EPA-induced suppression of INa,alpha beta was mainly due to fatty acid block of closed resting channels and did not require that the channels enter the open state to gain access to a "binding" site. The inhibition was removed after washout of EPA. In addition, the time course of the EPA-induced suppression of INa,alpha beta in another group of experiments was not altered when the stimulating rate of pulses was altered from 0.1 to 1 Hz (data not shown). These results are consistent with our previous findings (40, 41, 43) that EPA-induced inhibition of cardiac Na+ and Ca2+ channels are time dependent, but not use dependent, in rat cardiac myocytes and in HEK293t cells transfected with hH1alpha .


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10.   EPA-induced tonic block of INa,alpha beta . A: time course of EPA-induced inhibition of INa,alpha beta in the absence (control) and presence (EPA) of 5 µM EPA as well as during washout. Inset: original currents were evoked by pulses from -150 to -30 mV, and arrows indicate the time points when current traces were recorded. B: tonic block (1st pulse) and frequency block (30th pulse) of hH1alpha beta Na+ channels by 5 µM EPA (n = 9) are well overlapped. Data were fit by a logistical equation (see MATERIALS AND METHODS).

To examine EPA block of open-state hH1alpha beta channels, we used the same experimental protocol as in Fig. 10A and examined the concentration dependence of tonic block of closed, resting-state channels (Kr) and that of state-dependent block of open channels (Ko, an estimate) (32). Figure 10B shows that EPA has very similar effects on the resting state and the open state of hH1alpha beta . The IC50 of EPA was 4.72 ± 1.26 and 4.82 ± 1.36 µM for the resting-state channel block and the open-state channel block, respectively (n = 9, P > 0.05). The data further support the suggestion that EPA-induced inhibition of cardiac Na+ currents is time dependent, not use dependent, which is consistent with its high lipid solubility (16).

Fatty acid effects on Na+ currents in HEK293t cells transfected with hH1alpha or hH1alpha plus beta 1-subunit. Table 1 summarizes the inhibitory effects of several fatty acids on INa,alpha beta and INa,alpha . EPA, DHA, alpha -linolenic acid, conjugated linoleic acid (all 5 µM), and retinoic acid (10 µM) are significant inhibitors of these Na+ currents. EPA ethyl ester at 5 µM had no effect on either INa,alpha beta or INa,alpha . Monounsaturated and saturated fatty acids (5 µM) had no significant inhibitory effects on INa,alpha beta but significantly inhibited INa,alpha . This loss of the characteristic fatty acid specificity on INa,alpha was recovered when the beta 1-subunit was coexpressed in HEK293t cells.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.   Effects of fatty acids on Na+ currents in HEK293t cells transfected with hH1alpha or hH1alpha plus beta 1-subunit


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Modulation of hH1alpha channels by the beta 1-subunit. In our present study, coexpression of the rat brain beta 1-subunit with the hH1