|
|
||||||||
Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This study employs two modeling approaches to investigate short-term interval-force relations. The first approach is to develop a low-order, discrete-time model of excitation-contraction coupling to determine which parameter combinations produce the degree of postextrasystolic potentiation seen experimentally. Potentiation is found to increase 1) for low recirculation fraction, 2) for high releasable fraction, i.e., the maximum fraction of Ca2+ released from the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) given full restitution, and 3) for strong negative feedback of the SR release on sarcolemmal Ca2+ influx. The second modeling approach is to develop a more detailed single ventricular cell model that simulates action potentials, Ca2+-handling mechanisms, and isometric force generation by the myofilaments. A slow transition from the adapted state of the ryanodine receptor produces a gradual recovery of the SR release and restitution behavior. For potentiation, a small extrasystolic release leaves more Ca2+ in the SR but also increases the SR loading by two mechanisms: 1) less Ca2+-induced inactivation of L-type channels and 2) reduction of action potential height by residual activation of the time-dependent delayed rectifier K+ current, which increases Ca2+ influx. The cooperativity of the myofilaments amplifies the relatively small changes in the Ca2+ transient amplitude to produce larger changes in isometric force. These findings suggest that short-term interval-force relations result mainly from the interplay of the ryanodine receptor adaptation and the SR Ca2+ loading, with additional contributions from membrane currents and myofilament activation.
excitation-contraction coupling; calcium handling; mechanical restitution
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
SHORT-TERM INTERVAL-FORCE (I-F) relations, as defined
by Johnson (23), describe the dependence of contraction strength for short interbeat intervals (
3 s) in the physiological range for active
mammals. Two phenomena that characterize the short-term I-F relations
are restitution and postextrasystolic potentiation. Examples of
experimentally obtained I-F relations from Wier and Yue (42) are shown
in Fig. 1. The pacing protocol is a priming period,
which is followed by variable extrasystolic intervals (ESIs) and then a
fixed 3,000-ms postextrasystolic interval (PESI). The family of
traces demonstrates restitution by the rise in twitch force (F), rate
of force onset (+dF/dt), and
aequorin luminescence (L/Lmax) as ESI
increases (cf. a and
b in Fig. 1). Twitch force in response
to a second stimulus applied at a fixed PESI shows the opposite
behavior. For example, a small extrasystolic force leads to a
potentiated postextrasystolic beat (a
and a' in Fig. 1). Similarly, as
extrasystolic force rises with restitution, postextrasystolic force
declines (b and
b' in Fig. 1). These data, along
with other experimental studies (11, 46), have shown that
restitution and postextrasystolic potentiation can be fit to
exponentials with similar time constants, suggesting that a common
mechanism may underlie both phenomena.
|
A relatively simple model has been developed to address the general behavior of restitution and postextrasystolic potentiation (12, 42). This model explains these behaviors in terms of the interplay of two features: 1) the total amount of Ca2+ loaded in the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) and 2) a feature in which Ca2+ loaded in the SR slowly becomes available for the next release. More specifically, restitution is explained by more Ca2+ becoming available for release as ESI increases. Given a sufficiently long ESI, the saturating plateau level of Ca2+ release at full restitution is assumed to reflect the total amount of Ca2+ in the SR. This plateau level has been shown to increase with the frequency of stimulation during the priming period. Presumably, this increase occurs because of a greater time-averaged influx of Ca2+ that loads the SR to a greater extent. Furthermore, after a small extrasystolic release, postextrasystolic potentiation occurs because 1) there is more Ca2+ remaining in the SR for the next release and 2) additional Ca2+ influx into the cell increases the SR Ca2+ load for the next release. The proposed mechanism for the additional Ca2+ influx is a reduction of negative feedback of the SR Ca2+ release on influx of Ca2+ through L-type Ca2+ channels (42).
Although this model makes accurate predictions of the general behaviors of restitution and postextrasystolic potentiation, it lacks mechanistic detail. The purpose of this study is to develop new models that improve on the results of the previous modeling efforts described above. The first phase of this work entails the development of a discrete-time model of excitation-contraction (E-C) coupling to address how systematic parameter variation affects restitution/postextrasystolic potentiation behaviors. The approach of using discrete-time models has been explored previously (1, 35). In these models, all E-C coupling events are represented only at a discrete-time point for each beat, although the interval between beats is allowed to vary. In general, this modeling approach [referred to elsewhere as a "minimum model" (35)] seeks to capture the most salient features of I-F relations in a low-order system. The discrete-time model developed here is of even lower order than in previously published models, because the model developed here focuses only on extrasystolic restitution and postextrasystolic potentiation and not on other I-F phenomena. Also the model output is the isometric contraction force, not the Ca2+ transient, as in previous models, to allow for a more direct comparison with experimental results.
The second phase of modeling entails the development of a
"detailed" model [referred to elsewhere as a "maximum
model" (35)]. The assumption inherent in the development of
these models is that I-F relations will be reproduced if the underlying
biophysical mechanisms are reproduced. A detailed model is developed
here by combining a single ventricular cell model simulating action potentials (APs) and Ca2+-handling
mechanisms (20) with a model of the myofilaments simulating isometric
force generation (32). The single cardiac cell model incorporates
recent experimental findings on the mechanisms of E-C coupling in
cardiac cells, including 1)
adaptation of the ryanodine receptor (RyR), the SR release channel;
2) a model of the L-type
Ca2+ channel with
Ca2+-induced inactivation based on
mode switching (18); and 3) a restricted subspace thought to exist between the RyR and L-type Ca2+ channels, where the local
Ca2+ concentration
([Ca2+]) is
thought to rise to
10 times the bulk myoplasmic
[Ca2+]
([Ca2+]i)
(19, 33). The myofilament model used in this model can reproduce
isometric force responses seen experimentally and allows for direct
comparison of model output with experimental data on I-F relations.
The "minimum" and "maximum" approaches to model I-F
relations in this study are complementary. The low-order discrete-time model is suitable for systematic parameter variation studies. However,
this model lacks mechanistic detail, and the physiological plausibility
of any given parameter choice is difficult to assess on the basis of
simple model results alone. The detailed model can better address such
issues. However, the complexity of this model precludes exhaustive
exploration of the complete parameter space.
|
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Simple Model Construction
A simple model is developed as shown in Fig. 2. The model assumes two sources of intracellular Ca2+ per AP: one from across the sarcolemma (InSC) and one from the SR release (InSR). Ca2+ is removed from the cell by efflux across the sarcolemma (OutSC) and uptake into the SR (OutSR). Each of the four variables just described is calculated at each iteration [denoted by (n)]. Additional equations governing the system are given below.
|
The amount of Ca2+ released from
the SR during each AP is assumed to depend on the amount of
Ca2+ in the SR and the state of
restitution. The governing equation for the SR release is given by
|
(1) |
1) is the total Ca2+ load
of the SR computed from the last iteration,
is the fraction of the
total load that can be released with the assumption of full
restitution, and
(n) is the
restitution function that assumes a value between 0 and 1. The
restitution function is
|
(2) |
t(n)
is the time difference between the last AP and the present AP and
is the time constant of restitution.
The simple model assumes that transarcolemmal influx
(InSC) does not contribute
directly to the Ca2+ transient but
is, instead, sequestered by the SR and is made available for release
only on the subsequent beat. Hence, the total
Ca2+ transient is produced by the
SR release alone
|
(3) |
In the simple model the SR uptake
[OutSR(n)]
contains a component from the recirculation fraction
(r) of the
Ca2+ transient and a component
from the sarcolemmal influx
|
(4) |
|
(5) |
|
(6) |
The sarcolemmal influx (InSC) is
assumed to be a decreasing function of the
Ca2+ transient to account for
Ca2+-induced inactivation of
L-type channels. The effect of
Ca2+-induced inactivation is that
a small Ca2+ release from the SR
on the current beat produces a greater influx of
Ca2+, which in turn increases the
SR load for the next beat. The input across the sarcolemma is given by
|
(7) |
is a constant,
(n) is defined in
Eq. 2, and
h is a constant between 0 and 1 that
corresponds to the amount of
Ca2+-induced inactivation. A value
of h near 1 produces a large
dependence of sarcolemmal influx on the
Ca2+ transient, whereas a value of
0 corresponds to a constant sarcolemmal influx with no dependence on
the Ca2+ transient. Although the
formulation of Eq. 7 does not appear to depend on the Ca2+ transient,
there is an implicit dependence through the term
(n) [SR release and
Ca2+ transient are directly
proportional to
(n), see
Eqs. 1 and 7].
The model just described produces
Ca2+ transients for each beat. The
Ca2+ transients must be converted
to force transients for every beat to compare the model predictions
more directly with experimental results. This is accomplished with the
following conversion
|
(8) |
and
are empirically determined constants. This
relation follows directly from the work of Wier and Yue (42) that demonstrates that peak force is linearly correlated with peak [Ca2+]. The average
values from this study are
= 0.03 N · mm
2 · µM
1
and
= 0.51 µM. Empirical data also determine the time constant of
restitution (in Eq. 2) to be equal
to 765 ms. With these parameters constrained, the simple model is run
with the following free parameters: r,
, and h.
Simple Model Simulation Protocol
The simulation protocol is based on the experimental work of Wier and Yue (42) and is shown schematically in Fig. 1. In the original experiment, 12-20 priming beats were used to load the SR and produce a near steady-state output. In the simulations the number of priming beats is increased to 60 to ensure a near-steady output for all choices of model parameters. The influx constant
in
Eq. 7 is adjusted to generate a
standard force level by the 60th priming beat. The standard level of
force is arbitrarily chosen to be 12.5 ± 0.1 mN/mm2, a level similar to the
last steady-state beat in Fig. 1. The priming beats are delivered at
1,500-ms intervals. The ESI is varied between 150 and 3,000 ms in
150-ms increments. The PESI is fixed at 3,000 ms.
The initial conditions are chosen to yield a force close to the
standard value of 12.5 ± 0.1 mN/mm2. The initial conditions are
|
(9) |
|
(10) |
|
(11) |
|
(12) |
|
(13) |
Detailed Model Construction
The detailed model is derived from two models developed previously. Briefly, membrane currents and Ca2+ handling are described using a modified version of a single cardiac cell model described previously (20). This model lacked force generation, which is now provided by a model of the myofilaments (model 5 in Ref. 32). The two models are linked as follows. The cardiac cell model provides the Ca2+ transient to drive the myofilament model. This is a feedforward pathway by which the Ca2+ transient produces binding to troponin and subsequent force generation by the myofilaments. A feedback pathway also exists, because the affinity of troponin for Ca2+ is a function of developed force. Specifically the off-rate of Ca2+ from troponin is assumed to be a decreasing function of normalized force. Thus the level of developed force can alter the amount of Ca2+ bound to troponin and, subsequently, alter the activator Ca2+ transient (in the original cardiac cell model, troponin was assumed to be a simple buffer).The full set of equations for the detailed model is provided in the APPENDIX. The description here will focus on a number of critical differences between the new formulation and the previous model (20) from which it was derived.
RyRs.
The original formulation of RyRs was modified to
increase the forward rate to and reverse rate from the adapted state
(PC 2 in
Eqs. A71-A74). The forward rate
was increased to 100 s
1 to
make the time constant of adaptation ~10 ms. A similar value of 15 ms
is found experimentally for the rat at room temperature (45). The model
assumes a slightly higher rate at a physiological temperature. The
increase in forward rate makes adaptation a more important modulatory
factor in shaping SR release than in the original model (20). These
roles can justified by recent experimental findings that suggest an
important role of RyR inactivation in terminating release (36).
Network SR-to-junctional SR transfer rate. The SR is assumed to consist of two compartments: the uptake compartment [network SR (NSR)] and the release compartment [junctional SR (JSR)]. The transfer rate between these compartments is set by JTR. In the original model (20), JTR was a relatively small value, resulting in the depletion of JSR during each AP, hastening the termination of the SR release. In the present model, JTR is made sufficiently large so that NSR and JSR vary by only a small amount. A large value of JTR is consistent with estimates that Ca2+ diffusion between these compartments should be quite rapid, requiring only a few milliseconds at most (9).
Ca2+-ATPase pump. The formulation of the SR Ca2+-ATPase pump was modified to be similar to a model proposed by Shannon et al. (38) that includes both forward and reverse modes, each with its own binding constant and maximum rate. The forward mode exhibits slight cooperativity, with an experimentally determined value of 1.2 (38). In the original Ca2+-handling model (20), forward cooperativity of 2 was assumed, which is consistent with other estimates (28). In the present model, a value of 1.4 is chosen as a compromise between these two conflicting estimates. In general, the choice of this parameter was limited by two extremes. Low cooperativity values cause the Ca2+-ATPase pump to run at relatively high rates during diastole, producing unphysiologically low [Ca2+]i. High cooperativity values cause a rapid increase in pump rate as [Ca2+]i increases. This leads to Ca2+ transients with narrow peaks. This is a consequence of the large SR uptake at peak [Ca2+]i.
A final change is the removal of a Ca2+ leak from the SR. In the original model, the leak kept [Ca2+]NSR from rising too high by counterbalancing the Ca2+-ATPase pump, which had no reverse rate. This SR leak is no longer necessary, inasmuch as the Ca2+-ATPase has a reverse rate that counterbalances the forward rate as [Ca2+]NSR increases.Detailed Model Simulation Protocol
The model comprises 36 ordinary differential equations that are solved using the methods described in our previous modeling work (20). The equations, standard parameters, and initial conditions are provided in the Glossary and in the APPENDIX. The pacing stimulus is a square pulse of 100 mA with a 0.5-ms duration.Similar to the experimental work of Wier and Yue (42), a priming period of 30 s is sufficient to bring the detailed model to approximately steady state. The priming beats are delivered at a fixed interval of 1,500 ms in the simulations, unless otherwise noted in RESULTS. The ESI is varied between 236.6 and 2,842.1 ms in 236.6-ms increments. The PESI is fixed at 3,000 ms. It is emphasized that the detailed model simulation involves only changes in the stimulus pattern, and otherwise no parameters are varied to alter the restitution/postextrasystolic behavior.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Simple Model
Sample simulation results for the simple, discrete-time model are shown in Fig. 3. The parameter choices for this run are r (recirculation fraction) = 0.75,
(releasable fraction) = 0.5, and
h (feedback parameter) = 0.27. Figure 3A shows
Ca2+ transients, and Fig.
3B shows the corresponding force
transients. The last two priming beats are shown in Fig. 3,
A and B,
left, and demonstrate that the model has reached steady
state. The plots show a composite of 10 runs with ESI ranging from 300 ms (a in Fig. 3) to 3,000 ms
(b in Fig. 3), a range similar to
that of the experimental data in Fig. 1. As in the experimental data, as ESI increases, restitution of
Ca2+ transients and force
transients occurs. Note that force is 0 at the shortest ESI, because
the Ca2+ transient is less than
(see Eq. 8). For ESI equal to
the priming interval (1,500 ms), there is incomplete restitution
because of the long time constant of restitution (
= 765 ms, see
Eq. 2). Restitution is nearly
complete when ESI is maximal at 3,000 ms (b in Fig. 3).
|
The postextrasystolic beats show behavior that is opposite from that of
the extrasystolic beats; i.e., the least amount of restitution
(a in Fig. 3) corresponds to the
greatest level of potentiation
(a' in Fig. 3). In contrast, the
force at full restitution (b in Fig.
3) corresponds to the lowest level of postextrasystolic potentiation
(b' in Fig. 3). This behavior is
qualitatively consistent with experimental data from a number of
studies in whole heart (11) and muscle preparations (24, 29, 42).
However, the simulated and experimental results differ quantitatively
in the degree of postextrasystolic potentiation. In the experimental data, postextrasystolic force can be two or more times greater than the
steady-state force from the last priming beat (29, 42, 44, 46). The
level of postextrasystolic potentiation is smaller in this simulation.
A potentiation ratio can be computed as the ratio of force at the
greatest level of potentiation
(a' in Fig. 3 corresponding to
the shortest ESI) to the force in response to the last priming beat (ss
in Fig. 3). The potentiation ratio is 1.53, which falls short of
experimental data (
2), at least for the parameters chosen for this simulation.
The next set of simulations addresses the question of whether another
choice of r,
, and
h can produce a high level of
postextrasystolic potentiation. The simulation protocol used in Fig. 3
is repeated for r in the range
0.5-0.975 and h in the range
0.0-1.0;
is fixed at 0.25, 0.5, and 0.75 in Fig.
4, A,
B, and C,
respectively. The resulting potentiation ratios are plotted as a
surface plot and as a contour plot. The contour plots show the
isoclines for parameter combinations that produce potentiation ratios
of 1.5, 2, 3, and 4, as labeled.
|
In a comparison of Fig. 4, A-C,
the potentiation ratio increases as
increases for any given choice
of r and
h. A small
means that only a small
fraction of the total SR Ca2+ is
released (and resequestered) on each AP. The net effect is that the SR
loading shows little beat-to-beat variation. In contrast, a high level
of postextrasystolic potentiation requires a large change in the SR
load after the extrasystole. Recall that the SR release is a function
of restitution and the SR load (see Eq. 1). For the simulations, the PESI is long (3,000 ms),
so there is full restitution (
~ 1). Hence, the SR load is the
only variable that changes the level of postextrasystolic potentiation.
For example, the difference between
a' and
b' in Fig.
3A can be attributed solely to
differences in the SR loading.
The potentiation ratio increases for decreasing
r at any given choice of
and
h. Intuitively, decreasing
r means that less of the
Ca2+ released is being recycled
back into the SR. The net effect is to increase the beat-to-beat
variation in the SR load that is crucial for high levels of
postextrasystolic potentiation. In contrast, a large
r means that most of the
Ca2+ released is being recycled
back into the SR. Hence, each beat has almost the same SR load, a
feature incompatible with a large degree of postextrasystolic potentiation.
The potentiation ratio increases with
h at any given choice of
and
r. The feedback parameter
h controls the degree to which the
Ca2+ transient has a
negative-feedback effect on the sarcolemmal influx. Recall that
sarcolemmal influx goes directly to loading the SR for the next beat.
Therefore, the negative feedback increases the beat-to-beat variation
in sarcolemmal influx and also the SR loading. For example, a short ESI
produces a small extrasystolic Ca2+ transient, which in turn
produces little negative feedback. With a large
h, the result is a relatively larger
sarcolemmal influx that increases SR load and potentiation.
In Fig. 4, the potentiation ratio is <2 for small
h. Moreover, if
h = 0, then the potentiation ratio is
<2 for all choices of r (range
0.5-0.95) and
(0.05-1.0, all data are not shown). Hence,
the simulation results suggest that negative feedback on sarcolemmal
influx plays a critical role in producing the large degree of
postextrasystolic potentiation observed in the cardiac muscle.
Detailed Model
Figure 5 shows simulation results for the detailed model with use of the experimental protocol of Wier and Yue (42). Similar to the experimental data, the last priming beat is shown to demonstrate the steady-state output level. After the last priming beat, a family of traces is shown for different ESIs, each of which is accompanied by a postextrasystolic beat 3,000 ms later. [Ca2+]i is shown in Fig. 5A, and the corresponding isometric twitch force is shown in Fig. 5B. Only the force results can be directly compared with the experimental results in Fig. 1. To facilitate further comparison with experimental results, the simulated force data are plotted as the rate of force onset (+dF/dt;
dF/dt is not shown) in Fig.
6A. Also
shown in Fig. 6B is a simulated
aequorin fluorescence signal
(L/Lmax). This
signal is derived from
[Ca2+]i
according to a fit to calibration data provided by Wier and Yue
|
(14) |
|
|
When corresponding traces are compared, the experimental and model results are similar in extrasystolic restitution and postextrasystolic potentiation. The potentiation ratio is slightly >2 for force (a' = 0.0326 and ss = 0.0157 in Fig. 5B). The relative changes in peak [Ca2+]i levels (Fig. 5A) are considerably smaller than those for peak force, similar to the experimental results. The peak [Ca2+]i of the last priming beat is ~0.825 µM, whereas that of the maximally potentiated beat is 1.11 µM.
We hypothesize that the short-term I-F relations are produced from an
interplay of RyR adaptation and the SR loading. This hypothesis is
investigated using the detailed model. In Fig.
7A, RyR
open probabilities are plotted for the same sequence as in Fig. 5. As
ESI increases, the peak open probability increases from 0.269 for the
shortest ESI (a in Fig. 7) to 0.853 for the longest ESI (b in Fig. 7). In
contrast, the peak open probability is a constant value of 0.869 for
each of the postextrasystolic beats. In this case, the SR release
depends mainly on the SR load. This feature is shown in Fig.
7B by plotting the
[Ca2+] in the NSR,
where uptake occurs
([Ca2+]NSR),
and in the junctional SR, where release occurs
([Ca2+]JSR).
In this model, these compartments are coupled with a small time
constant so that
[Ca2+]NSR
and
[Ca2+]JSR
are very close, except during the SR release, where
[Ca2+]JSR
is transiently lower than
[Ca2+]NSR.
During each AP, the transient decreases in the SR load closely mirror
the Ca2+ transients in Fig.
5A, because
Ca2+ release from JSR makes the
primary contribution to the Ca2+
transient.
|
For postextrasystolic potentiation, the important variable is the degree of the SR loading after the restitution beat. For the shortest ESI (a in Fig. 7B), there is a relatively small decrease in [Ca2+]JSR that recovers to a higher value. The small release occurs because most of the RyRs are in the adapted state, and not from a slow transfer from NSR to JSR. [Ca2+]JSR has reached its peak value for a in Fig. 7 compared with larger ESIs so that a lack of available Ca2+ for release is not an issue in restitution for this model (i.e., there is no component of restitution from a slow transfer of Ca2+ from NSR to JSR). Also there is a slow decrease in [Ca2+]NSR and [Ca2+]JSR when no APs are occurring (i.e., in the period between a and a' in Fig. 7). The slow decrease is produced by two features. First, after the AP, there is still release from the SR, because the RyR open probability is small but nonzero. Consider that, after an AP, most of the RyRs are in the adapted state (PC 2). The RyRs revert back to the resting closed state (PC 1), but this transition requires a sojourn through an open state (PO 1). This transition through the open state causes the nonzero open probability. A second feature that produces a slow unloading of the SR is that the Ca2+-ATPase pump can run in a reverse mode. The balance between the forward mode (that fills NSR) and the reverse mode (that empties NSR) depends on [Ca2+]i and [Ca2+]NSR (see Eqs. A76-A78). During diastole, when [Ca2+]i is small and [Ca2+]NSR is larger, the reverse mode is more favored, so some degree of NSR emptying occurs.
Figure 7B shows that the potentiation
at a' occurs because the SR
[Ca2+] recovers to a
higher level than the steady-state value achieved after the priming
period (ss in Fig. 7B). The small
release (a in Fig.
7B) leaves more residual
Ca2+ in the SR to help potentiate
the next beat. Recall from the simple model results that a strong
feedback on sarcolemmal influx is required to achieve a high level of
potentiation. This effect is shown in Fig.
8A, where
L-type Ca2+ currents
(top traces, right axis) are plotted
for the same sequence as in Fig. 5. The L-type
Ca2+ current is largest at the
shortest ESI (a in Fig. 8). The
reasons are twofold. First, the small SR release produces less
Ca2+-induced inactivation of the
L-type Ca2+ current. Second, the
AP (Fig. 8A, bottom traces, left
axis) has reduced amplitude, because the
time-dependent K+ membrane current
has not yet fully recovered and is still partially activated. The
result is that the peak membrane potential is substantially lower than
the reversal potential for the L-type
Ca2+ current (~50 mV, see Fig. 3 in Ref. 20) that increases the net driving force for
Ca2+ entry. Hence, the low AP
amplitude produces increased Ca2+
influx.
|
The increase in L-type Ca2+ current at short ESI helps produce a high level of potentiation. This effect is explored further in Fig. 8B, where the time-integrated flux of Ca2+ is computed for the influx through L-type channels (middle traces), SR release through RyRs (top traces), and the sum of the other membrane Ca2+ currents (bottom traces). The combined fluxes of other membrane Ca2+ currents (Na+/Ca2+ exchanger, sarcolemmal Ca2+ pump, and background Ca2+ leak) can be added to the influx through L-type channels to compute the net change in cellular Ca2+ load. The integrated fluxes are presented as concentrations that are computed with respect to the volume of the myoplasm. This method facilitates direct comparisons of membrane currents (both sets of bottom traces) and intracellular fluxes (top traces). Also the fluxes into the myoplasm are positive, whereas extrusion from the myoplasm is negative.
For the shortest ESI (a in Fig. 8), the total Ca2+ release is smaller than for the last priming beat (ss in Fig. 8). The corresponding postextrasystolic beat (a' in Fig. 8) produces the largest release. The other traces show data for the longest ESI (b in Fig. 8) and an intermediate value (c in Fig. 8) and correspond to the labeled transients in Fig. 8A. Figure 8B also illustrates some key characteristics of Ca2+ handling. First, the time-integrated SR release flux has a fairly stairlike waveform, indicating that the majority of Ca2+ is released over a short period of time. In contrast, the integrated L-type Ca2+ flux has a sloping appearance that indicates a smaller-magnitude flux over a longer time interval. The contribution of the cellular Ca2+ extrusion mechanisms is shown by the sum of the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger, sarcolemmal Ca2+ pump, and background Ca2+ leak fluxes. The contribution of the background Ca2+ leak flux is included, because this current counterbalances the other currents so that the net cellular Ca2+ load does not deplete too quickly during diastole. The summed flux (bottom traces in Fig. 8B) first has a positive-going deflection after an AP as a result of the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger running in reverse mode. The positive-going deflection is slightly larger for the shortest ESI (a in Fig. 8), indicating that more Ca2+ enters the cell during the small Ca2+ transient (favoring the reverse Na+/Ca2+ exchanger mode). This suggests some contribution of extrusion mechanisms to increased SR loading and potentiation. However, by the postextrasystolic release, the total Ca2+ extruded from the cell (indicated by the downward deflection of the trace) is very similar for a', b', and c'. This shows that total extrusion Ca2+ is fairly independent of the stimulus pattern and suggests a fairly minor role in beat-to-beat changes in cellular (and hence SR) Ca2+ load, at least for the pattern tested.
Recirculation fraction can be estimated from Fig.
8B. One way to estimate this quantity
is
|
|
|
(15) |
|
|
|
(16) |
7 M. The total
extrusion is computed from the combined fluxes of other membrane
Ca2+ currents. The amount of
extrusion in the bottom trace
(c in Fig. 8B), just before the extrasystole,
shows that integrated Ca2+
extruded from the cell is 2.3 × 10
7 M. With use of these
values and Eq. 15,
r is calculated to be 0.79.
In summary, the detailed model has been shown to reproduce experimental findings that show slow recovery of force during restitution, with similar results found for the rate of force onset (+dF/dt) and the Ca2+ transient. There has not yet been any examination of the temporal details of restitution. Many experimental findings show that restitution can be fit by an exponential (2, 11, 42, 46). For example, the data in Fig. 1 have time constants on the order of 700-800 ms (42). Other sets of experimental findings show that as the priming rate increases, the plateau at full restitution increases while the time constant of the exponential rise is unchanged (11).
The ability of the detailed model to reproduce these experimental
findings is now examined in Fig.
9A, where
the priming rate is increased from the original basic cycle length
(BCL) of 1,500 ms to 1,250 and 1,000 ms. Here the peak rates of force
onset (peak dF/dt) are shown for the
range of ESIs in Fig. 5, and an exponential fit is shown with
as
labeled. Consistent with experimental observations, the higher priming
rate increases the plateau level but produces little change in the time
constant of restitution. Although only data for peak rate of force
onset are shown, similar results are obtained for force, a result also
consistent with experimental findings (22, 42). The lowest ESI produced
peak force or dF/dt values that are
not well fit by the exponentials; hence, they are not included in the
fits shown. These points are larger than predicted by an exponential
curve fit and, if included, would give the restitution curves a
sigmoidal shape. However, this deviation should not be considered to be
significant, because this trend can also be seen in some experimentally
determined restitution curves (see Fig.
3A in Ref. 12).
|
The peak rate of force onset for postextrasystolic data is plotted in Fig. 9B. These results show that postextrasystolic data are also well fit by exponential curves with time constants on the order of 700 ms, consistent with experimental findings (42). Very similar exponential fits and time constants are obtained for force data. The close similarity between time constants for restitution and postextrasystolic potentiation is seen in experimental results and has been interpreted to suggest a common mechanism (42, 46).
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The simple, discrete-time model produces restitution but is only able
to generate high levels of potentiation with appropriate parameter
choices. Specifically, potentiation ratio increases with increase in
the release fraction (
), decrease in the recirculation fraction
(r), and increase in the feedback
parameter (h). The effects of
varying these three parameters are now considered separately.
Release Fraction
The release fraction is the maximum fraction of Ca2+ in the SR that can be released, given full restitution. Some experimental estimates suggest that about one-half of the total amount of Ca2+ in the SR is released on each beat in the guinea pig (14). Similar values are reported for the rabbit, rat, and ferret, although some variation can occur with the degree of SR loading (4, 5). If it is assumed that these estimates correspond to a release that is characterized by full restitution, then a releasable fraction of 50% can be inferred. Behavior of the simple model suggests that such a small release fraction would make high levels of potentiation difficult to achieve. Recall that in the simple model results, only large release fractions near 1 produce high levels of potentiation.The discrepancy between the modeling results and the experimental work may result from the release fraction being an increasing function of the SR load (5, 39). This experimental finding invalidates the constant release fraction assumption in the simple model. A likely consequence of the variable release fraction would be an increase in potentiation, because any increase in the SR loading (from an extrasystole at a short ESI) will also produce release of a greater fraction of the increased load. An alternative explanation for the discrepancy could be that experimental methods underestimate the release fraction. The experiments compared Ca2+ released from the SR during an AP with Ca2+ released during caffeine application. However, the possibility exists that some Ca2+ in the SR may not be involved in normal E-C coupling but is only released with caffeine (14), leading to underestimation of the release fraction.
Recirculation Fraction
The recirculation fraction is the fraction of Ca2+ released from the SR during each Ca2+ transient that is resequestered back into the SR. Large values of this parameter reduce postextrasystolic potentiation, because most of the released SR Ca2+ is recycled back into the SR on each beat. This in turn leads to smaller beat-to-beat variability in the SR load. In this modeling study, only values of recirculation fraction >0.5 were considered. The rationale for this is that smaller values are unlikely to occur in real myocardium. The argument for this is as follows. Assume a minimum value of recirculation fraction of 0.5. From Eq. 5, the remainder of the Ca2+ in the transient must be extruded across the sarcolemma on each beat. These conditions imply that
|
(17) |
|
(18) |
|
(19) |
|
(20) |
Estimates from experimental studies indicate that sarcolemmal influx provides only 20% of the Ca2+ necessary to produce a typical transient (8, 10, 13) (these estimates are from rat and are most likely lower than that for guinea pig, which has a less-developed SR). Now consider the steady-state assumptions, developed above, where sarcolemmal influx equals the SR release [InSC(n) = InSR(n)]. In the simple model the total Ca2+ in the transient is assumed to be the SR release alone, which would be 20% of the necessary Ca2+. Hence, these results suggest that a recirculation fraction of 0.5 (or less) is incompatible with the experimental estimates of sarcolemmal influx per AP and the Ca2+ necessary to produce a typical myplasmic Ca2+ transient.
Feedback on the Sarcolemmal Influx
In the simple model, strong feedback on the sarcolemmal influx is necessary to reproduce potentiation ratios
2, as seen experimentally. For example, as described above, a reasonable estimate of
r is ~0.6 and
is ~0.5.
However, with use of these estimates, a potentiation ratio of 2 requires that h be ~0.7 (Fig.
4B). This value is large considering
that experimental data suggest that h
should only be ~0.25, as inferred from the effects of
Ca2+-induced inactivation of
L-type current (17). This discrepancy will be addressed in the
discussion of the detailed model results.
Although the simple model allows for complete freedom in setting h, there is an upper limit for plausibility. The simple model assumes that influx does not contribute directly to the Ca2+ transient. This is only an approximation, because the Ca2+ influx through the L-type channels must contribute to the Ca2+ transient, at least to some degree. With preliminary versions of the simple model, the Ca2+ transient was assumed to be the sum of the SR release and influx through the L-type channels. However, this construction produced blunted restitution because of a negative-feedback effect. Consider that a small SR release at a short ESI would be bolstered by a large L-type influx. Hence, when these two components are summed, the resulting Ca2+ transient is increased at short ESI, effectively reducing restitution behavior. Similarly, the detailed model results indicate that L-type current does produce a noticeable increase in the Ca2+ transient, especially when the SR release is small at short ESIs (a in Fig. 5A). Hence, there is likely a practical limit on how large h can be without counteracting the restitution behavior produced by the slow recovery of the SR release.
Previously Published Detailed Models
Previously published detailed models have failed to reproduce accurately restitution and postextrasystolic potentiation behavior. For example, the OxsoftHeart ventricular model fails to show restitution behavior (31). The Luo-Rudy phase II ventricular cell model does produce restitution behavior, as assessed by changes in [Ca2+]i transient amplitude (force is not computed). In this model, the restitution results from a different mechanism, a slow transfer of Ca2+ from the NSR to the JSR (27), instead of from refractoriness of the SR release channels, as in the detailed model developed here. The Luo-Rudy phase II model fails to show clear postextrasystolic potentiation behavior as a result of insufficient extra loading of the SR to potentiate the postextrasystole (31).Modifications to Improve Short-Term I-F Relations
The present model is based on a single cardiac cell model described previously (20). Besides the addition of myofilaments, the earlier Ca2+-handling model is modified in specific ways to improve the ability to reproduce short-term I-F relations. For example, the rate of adaptation of the RyRs is increased (see METHODS), which in turn makes adaptation a more important factor in terminating the SR release. This approach is justified by recent experimental findings that suggest that inactivation strongly modulates RyR release (36). In the models the recovery of release during restitution relies on the slow recovery of the RyR channels (Fig. 7A). This construction is consistent with recent data showing that restitution at the level of the Ca2+ sparks (fundamental E-C coupling events) depends on a slow recovery process with a time constant of 550 ms in rat (37).In contrast, our previous model (20) incorporated a long time constant
for Ca2+ transfer from NSR to JSR
to produce greater depletion of JSR. This long time constant is not
maintained in the new version of the model, because it produces a
number of undesirable behaviors. First, the restitution curves are very
sigmoidal instead of exponential (the present model produces only
slightly sigmoidal restitution curves, see leftmost points in Fig.
9A). Second, a long time constant, coupled with a high stimulus rate, could produce situations where [Ca2+]NSR
far exceeds
[Ca2+]JSR.
This often leads to spontaneous SR release and ectopic beating on
return to a lower stimulus rate. Finally, a long time constant allows
JSR to empty while NSR simultaneously fills. This effectively limits
the releasable fraction of Ca2+
from the SR [the previous model has a releasable fraction of ~0.3 (20)]. In the present version the decreased time constant produces greater emptying of the SR and effectively gives a higher releasable fraction of Ca2+.
Recall from the simple model results that a high releasable fraction
(
) improves the potentiation ratio by increasing the beat-to-beat
variation in the SR load.
Another change in the present model, as suggested by the simple model, is to decrease the recirculation fraction. Recall that a high recirculation fraction decreased the potentiation ratio by decreasing the beat-to-beat variation in the SR Ca2+ load. In the detailed model the recirculation fraction is reduced mainly by increasing the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger rate, which favors extrusion of Ca2+ across the sarcolemma rather than resequestration into the SR. However, the precise value of the recirculation fraction is constrained by a number of biophysical factors. As argued earlier, the influx of Ca2+ across the sarcolemma must be in net balance with the efflux to be in steady state. The first quantity can be estimated from experimental measurements of L-type Ca2+ current, whereas the second quantity is mainly the contribution from the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger current. This effectively limits efflux from the cell. Likewise, there must be a net balance of influx and efflux from the SR in the steady state. Given that enough Ca2+ must be released to activate the myofilaments, then efflux from and influx to the SR must be relatively large.
In the detailed model the recirculation fraction was found to be ~0.79. This value is consistent with experimental estimates for recirculation fraction as computed by comparing efflux of the myoplasmic Ca2+ via the competing pathways of the SR Ca2+-ATPase and Na+/Ca2+ exchange. These pathways are considered to be the major pathways, with the SR Ca2+-ATPase removing ~70% and the Na+/Ca2+ exchangers ~20-30% of Ca2+ released from SR (9). With the assumption of such a ratio, the recirculation fraction is ~0.7. Other researchers have suggested smaller values. Calculations using the beat-to-beat decay of potentiation (i.e., negative staircase) place the lower value of the recirculation fraction at 0.45 (41). However, this value contained a component from feedback on sarcolemmal input (analogous to h), which could potentially introduce considerable error.
An important finding from the simple model is that a large value of
h is required to produce potentiation
ratios of
2, as shown in experimental results. The feedback is found
to be relatively large in the detailed model. In Fig.
8A, the L-type channel
Ca2+ current trace for
a is roughly twice as large has that
for a'. The corresponding
h can then be estimated to be on the
order of 0.5. This value is actually larger that what might be
estimated by comparing experimentally measured L-type currents with and without the SR releases (17). These data show an ~25% increase in
L-type current when Ca2+-induced
inactivation is effectively removed by depleting the SR. However, these
data were collected with an AP clamp. In contrast, the detailed model,
running without an AP clamp, predicts that a small change in AP shape
at short ESIs may increase influx and effectively increase
h. Recall from Fig.
8A that the short ESI produced APs
with reduced amplitude, which in turn increased the driving force for
Ca2+ influx. Finally, this is an
example in which interaction between the membrane currents and the
Ca2+ handling required a detailed
model approach and could not have been predicted by the simple model alone.
Effects of Low External [Ca2+] on Potentiation
The detailed model, with changes outlined above, produced potentiation ratios of 2. This level is appropriate for that seen in the guinea pig (2, 29, 44) and the dog (12, 46). Interestingly, the data in Fig. 1, on which most of this study is based, are from ferret muscle with low external Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]o). In normal [Ca2+]o, the potentiation ratios were much reduced (42). The findings of this study offer a possible explanation for this disparity. The simple model results suggest that the potentiation ratio can be increased by a low recirculation fraction. One effect of low [Ca2+]o is to favor the forward mode of the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger, which results in greater extrusion of Ca2+ across the sarcolemma and decreases the recirculation fraction.Contribution of Myofilaments
Most of the discussion of the detailed model has focused on features that modify the magnitude of Ca2+ transients. This is justified, because Wier and Yue (42) showed that mechanical restitution and postextrasystolic potentiation depend directly on the SR release and the Ca2+ transient. However, the model suggests that the myofilaments may also make an important contribution to the observed phenomena. Recall that the relative changes in the peak Ca2+ transient are smaller (Fig. 5A) than for peak force (Fig. 5B) or peak rate of force onset (Fig. 6A). In the detailed model the relatively small change in the Ca2+ transient translates into a much larger change in force because of the highly cooperative force generation model. The myofilament model has a steady force-Ca2+ (F-Ca2+) relation with a Hill coefficient of ~6 for the sarcomere length used in the simulations (i.e., 2.15 µm). Although this value is consistent with numerous experimental estimates with intact muscle preparations (3, 15, 47), it is somewhat steeper than that of the simple model (based on the work of Weir and Yue). The steeper dependence in the detailed model allows for peak force to double (potentiation ratio = 2) with a total change in peak [Ca2+]i of only 0.3 µM (cf. ss and a' in Fig. 5A).In the development of the force generation model, the contribution of end-to-end troponin-tropomyosin interactions is assumed to produce the steady-state F-Ca2+ relations with high apparent cooperativity, as observed in real myocardium (32). For twitches, the highly cooperative behavior produces a steep dependence of peak force on the peak of the [Ca2+] transient. Another feature of the myofilament model is that troponin/tropomyosin is assumed to shift rapidly to a permissive state, whereas slower cross-bridge dynamics determine the rise of force. Such a construction makes the time to peak force relatively independent of level of peak force, consistent with experimental data (see data in Refs. 6, 21, and 41). Considered another way, the rate of rise of force is proportional to the peak level of force. This leads to the behavior seen in the detailed model, where peak force and the peak rate of force onset behave in a similar fashion (cf. Figs. 5B and Fig. 6A). These results are consistent with experimental findings that I-F relations are virtually identical for peak force and the peak rate of force onset in a variety of isolated muscle preparations (42, 44). Similarly, restitution behavior is equivalent for peak pressure and rate of pressure rise in the whole ventricle (12).
Limitations of the Detailed Model
Although adequately reproducing restitution and postextrasystolic potentiation behavior, the detailed model has limitations that should be addressed. In real cardiac cells, postextrasystolic potentiation may be augmented by three mechanisms not included in the detailed model. The first mechanism, as previously mentioned, is that the release fraction may be an increasing function of the SR load (5, 39). This mechanism could potentially increase potentiation, because any increase in the SR loading (such as occurs after a extrasystole) will also produce a greater fraction of the increased load being released. A second mechanism is that the SR uptake may be augmented for a short time after an AP that could preferentially increase the SR uptake for a short ESI. A proposed mechanism is the following sequence of events: the Ca2+ transient produces binding to calmodulin, activation of protein kinase C, phosphorylation of phospholamban, and increased SERCA uptake. A similar mechanism has been suggested by Schouten (34) to account for increased relaxation rates for short stimulus intervals. A third mechanism is that short ESIs could produce increased Ca2+ influx via L-type channels. Data from the dog and the guinea pig (40) show that L-type currents can overshoot the control level for interpulse intervals in a range similar to the range of ESIs studied here (i.e., the overshoot peaked at 30-100 ms after the repolarization of the initial pulse). The mechanism of the enhancement is unclear but may involve a dual modulation of the L-type channel. As proposed by some researchers (25, 30), slightly increased [Ca2+] may enhance L-type current (not included in the detailed model), whereas higher [Ca2+] will inactivate the channel (included in the detailed model).Another limitation of the detailed model involves species- and tissue-based differences in membrane currents and E-C coupling mechanisms. For example, the experimental data most used in this study (Fig. 1) are from ferret papillary muscle with low [Ca2+]o. Such a choice is justified given the completeness of this data set and the similarity to restitution/postextrasystolic potentiation behavior in other species. However, the detailed model was developed to correspond most closely to the guinea pig under physiological [Ca2+]o. Hence, one could question the validity of such an approach.
In defense of the study, we note that the most important behaviors we have sought to replicate in Fig. 1 are similar to those measured in guinea pig tissue. For example, restitution follows an exponential time course (2, 29, 44), although the rate of recovery may be somewhat faster than that in Fig. 1. Also similar to the data in Fig. 1, restitution and postextrasystolic potentiation follow similar time courses in the guinea pig (29). In this study the targeted level of the potentiation ratio is 2, a reasonable value for guinea pig ventricular (29) and papillary muscle (44). Even larger potentiation ratios are measured in other species, such as dog (46) and rabbit (43), so the mechanisms explored in this study may prove useful in generating models of these tissues.
Finally, difference in AP morphologies should be considered. The guinea pig has a relatively depolarized plateau phase. With such an AP morphology, residual activation of the delayed rectifier current could lower the AP amplitude at short ESI, thereby increasing the Ca2+ influx, SR loading, and potentiation. However, this finding may not carry over to other tissues with different AP morphologies or electrical restitution properties. For example, rabbit ventricle shows a less depolarized AP that increases in amplitude and duration at short ESIs (43), presumably as a result of reduced L-type channel inactivation. This AP change may contribute to increased Ca2+ influx and the high potentiation ratio in this tissue. Different behaviors are also likely to occur in tissues with a prominent transient outward current (I<