AJP - Heart Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 273: H583-H592, 1997;
0363-6135/97 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yasuda, S.
Right arrow Articles by Goto, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yasuda, S.
Right arrow Articles by Goto, Y.

AJP - Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Vol 273, Issue 2 583-H592, Copyright © 1997 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Severe diastolic dysfunction with preserved energy conversion efficiency after countershock

S. Yasuda, T. Shishido and Y. Goto
Department of Internal Medicine, National Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan.

The left ventricular (LV) mechanical performance and the LV myocardial oxygen consumption (VO2)-to-pressure-volume area (PVA; LV total mechanical energy index) relationship were measured in isovolumic contraction of isolated blood-perfused dog hearts before and after direct current (DC) countershocks. At a constant LV volume, DC shocks increased LV end-diastolic pressure progressively and strikingly with the progression of myocardial edema and a marked prolongation of the time constant of LV pressure decay. In contrast, DC shocks changed neither the slope of the LV end-systolic pressure-volume relationship nor the contractile efficiency (the slope of the Vo2-PVA relationship). The oxygen cost of contractility (the slope of the relationship between PVA-independent VO2 and LV contractility) increased 27% after DC shocks. However, the magnitude of this change was considerably smaller than that previously reported in postischemic stunned myocardium (123%), suggesting that the adverse effect of DC shocks on the energy cost of excitation-contraction coupling is relatively minor. Thus, despite the severe diastolic dysfunction, DC shocks do not substantially impair either the efficiency of cross-bridge cycling or calcium cycling. Myocardial interstitial edema is more likely a potential mechanism of diastolic dysfunction after DC shocks.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online