AJP - Heart Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 272: H2343-H2352, 1997;
0363-6135/97 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Desai, T. H.
Right arrow Articles by Mosqueda-Garcia, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Desai, T. H.
Right arrow Articles by Mosqueda-Garcia, R.

AJP - Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Vol 272, Issue 5 2343-H2352, Copyright © 1997 by American Physiological Society

ARTICLES

Modeling of arterial and cardiopulmonary baroreflex control of heart rate

T. H. Desai, J. C. Collins, M. Snell and R. Mosqueda-Garcia
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2195, USA.

We evaluated R-R interval changes (delta R-R interval) in 13 subjects (27 +/- 6 yr; 7 men and 6 women) as a function of blood pressure changes at the carotid sinus and aortic arch and central venous pressure changes at the cardiopulmonary receptors. Neck chamber pressure and suction were used to change pressure at the carotid sinus while lower body negative pressure, phenylephrine infusion, and nitroprusside infusion were used to change pressure at the carotid sinus (delta CSP), aortic arch (delta AAP), and cardiopulmonary receptors (delta CPP). Random effects regression analysis showed a significant linear relationship for delta R-R interval (-1.75 + 1.64 delta CSP + 15.40 delta AAP + 29.02 delta CPP + error), and the correlation (r) between the observed and predicted delta R-R interval was 0.82 (P < 0.00001). Sixty-seven percent of the delta R-R interval variability observed in the study is explained by the model. delta AAP accounts for approximately 63%, delta CSP for 14%, and delta CPP for 23% of the explained delta R-R interval.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
I. Fietze, D. Romberg, M. Glos, S. Endres, H. Theres, C. Witt, and V. K. Somers
Effects of positive-pressure ventilation on the spontaneous baroreflex in healthy subjects
J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2004; 96(3): 1155 - 1160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
R. Mukkamala and R. J. Cohen
A forward model-based validation of cardiovascular system identification
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2001; 281(6): H2714 - H2730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
B. Pump, T. Kamo, A. Gabrielsen, P. Bie, N. J. Christensen, and P. Norsk
Central volume expansion is pivotal for sustained decrease in heart rate during seated to supine posture change
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2001; 281(3): H1274 - H1279.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
A. Porta, G. Baselli, O. Rimoldi, A. Malliani, and M. Pagani
Assessing baroreflex gain from spontaneous variability in conscious dogs: role of causality and respiration
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2000; 279(5): H2558 - H2567.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online