AJP - Heart Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 270: H2169-H2176, 1996;
0363-6135/96 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kang, T.
Right arrow Articles by Yin, F. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kang, T.
Right arrow Articles by Yin, F. C.

AJP - Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Vol 270, Issue 6 2169-H2176, Copyright © 1996 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Comparison of biaxial mechanical properties of excised endocardium and epicardium

T. Kang, J. D. Humphrey and F. C. Yin
Department of Medicine, Cardiology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore 21205, USA.

A complete understanding of cardiac mechanics requires knowledge of the mechanical properties of each of the tissues that comprise the heart, Data and constitutive relations are available for the nonlinear multiaxial behavior of epicardium and noncontracting myocardium, but there have been no comparable results for endocardium. In this paper, we present biaxial mechanical data for endocardium and epicardium excised from the same bovine hearts. The data reveal that these two membranes behave differently; endocardium exhibits a greater stiffness in the low-strain range. Moreover, quantification of endocardial behavior requires a seven-parameter, polynomial-exponential pseudostrain-energy function w, whereas epicardium can be described by a four-parameter exponential w. Comparison of our current findings with previous results on canine epicardium reveals further that canine and bovine epicardium behave similarly, although the latter is more extensible. Thus there appear to be marked species differences.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
P. D. Jobsis, H. Ashikaga, H. Wen, E. C. Rothstein, K. A. Horvath, E. R. McVeigh, and R. S. Balaban
The visceral pericardium: macromolecular structure and contribution to passive mechanical properties of the left ventricle
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2007; 293(6): H3379 - H3387.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
M. M. Riordan and S. J. Kovacs
Stiffness- and relaxation-based quantitation of radial left ventricular oscillations: elucidation of regional diastolic function mechanisms
J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2007; 102(5): 1862 - 1870.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
C. A. J. Schulze-Bauer, P. Regitnig, and G. A. Holzapfel
Mechanics of the human femoral adventitia including the high-pressure response
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2002; 282(6): H2427 - H2440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
C. A. J. Schulze-Bauer, P. Regitnig, and G. A. Holzapfel
Mechanics of the human femoral adventitia including the high-pressure response
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2002; 282(6): H2427 - H2440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online