AJP - Heart Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 259: H1601-H1605, 1990;
0363-6135/90 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mast, F.
Right arrow Articles by Elzinga, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mast, F.
Right arrow Articles by Elzinga, G.

AJP - Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Vol 259, Issue 5 1601-H1605, Copyright © 1990 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Analysis of thermopile records from contracting isolated cardiac muscle

F. Mast, R. C. Woledge and G. Elzinga
Laboratory for Physiology, Free University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Recovery heat production after contraction in rabbit papillary muscle at 20 degrees C occurs at an exponentially declining rate. The time constant describing this decline is 25 s; it is not different when 10 twitches or when a steady-state twitch train is studied, and it is unaltered by changing stimulus frequency from 0.125 to 0.2 Hz. The same value has previously been found after single twitches. If it is assumed that phosphocreatine (PCr) resynthesis is the cause of recovery heat production and that it occurs also during contractions at a rate proportional to the amount of PCr depletion, it is possible to divide the total heat production for any period of stimulation into that caused by this recovery process (R) and that caused by initial (I) processes (presumed to be PCr splitting). The value of R/I obtained by using this method is 1.10 +/- 0.04 (means +/- SE, n = 27 muscles), close to the theoretical value of 1.13. The correspondence between the measured and the predicted ratio supports the assumptions underlying the measurement. Thus in heart muscle the heat produced during and after contraction can be explained by PCr splitting and reformation. The older Bugnard method of analysis applied to the same data gives an R/I value of 1.5; the reasons for the discrepancy are described.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online