AJP - Heart Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 258: H1882-H1888, 1990;
0363-6135/90 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stone, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Liang, C. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stone, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Liang, C. S.

AJP - Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Vol 258, Issue 6 1882-H1888, Copyright © 1990 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Attenuation of pressor responses to arginine vasopressin in right-sided congestive heart failure

C. K. Stone, N. Imai, C. D. Sladek and C. S. Liang
Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, New York 14642.

Although arginine vasopressin (AVP) is elevated in heart failure, inhibition of the vasopressinergic V1-receptor produces minimal changes in blood pressure. To determine whether the V1 vasoconstrictor effect is attenuated in heart failure, we randomly administered three increasing doses of AVP and methoxamine intravenously to 11 dogs with right-sided congestive heart failure (RHF) and 7 sham-operated dogs. Plasma AVP was elevated in RHF (21 +/- 3 pg/ml) compared with sham-operated dogs (3.8 +/- 0.6 pg/ml). While the pressor response to methoxamine was similar in the two groups, AVP caused a smaller increase in mean aortic pressure in RHF dogs than sham-operated dogs. To determine whether the difference in the pressor response to AVP was caused by greater reflex withdrawal of the sympathetic activity in RHF than sham-operated dogs, we also administered AVP after these animals had been pretreated with prazosin and propranolol. Adrenoceptor blockade exaggerated the pressor response to AVP; however, the increase in mean aortic pressure was still smaller in RHF than sham-operated dogs. The diminished pressor response in adrenoceptor-blocked RHF dogs was associated with a smaller increase in total peripheral vascular resistance compared with similarly treated sham dogs. Thus, although the pressor response to AVP was offset by baroreflex activation, the attenuated pressor effect of AVP in heart failure cannot be explained by sympathetic withdrawal alone. AVP probably exerts a smaller direct vasoconstrictor effect when the vasopressinergic system is chronically activated in heart failure.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online