AJP - Heart AJP: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 258: H722-H728, 1990;
0363-6135/90 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martin, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by McNeill, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Martin, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by McNeill, J. R.

AJP - Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Vol 258, Issue 3 722-H728, Copyright © 1990 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Arginine vasopressin increases apparent whole body capacity in anesthetized cats

D. S. Martin and J. R. McNeill
Department of Pharmacology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.

The effects of arginine vasopressin (AVP) on capacitance function were assessed in anesthetized cats by draining blood from the superior and inferior venae cavae into an external reservoir and then returning blood to the right atrium at a constant rate. Under these conditions, changes in reservoir volume were assumed to reflect reciprocal changes in whole body capacity. Intravenous infusions of AVP (1, 10, and 100 ng.kg-1.min-1) that elevated plasma AVP concentrations by approximately 30, 400, and 4,000 fmol/ml were associated with concentration-dependent increases in whole body capacity that ranged between 1.6 and 8 ml/kg. In contrast to AVP, intravenous infusions of angiotensin II (5, 10, and 50 ng.kg-1.min-1) had relatively little influence on capacity, whereas norepinephrine administration (300, 1,000, and 3,000 ng.kg-1.min-1) was associated with dose-dependent decreases in capacity of 4.5-10.3 ml/kg. Virtually the entire increase in whole body capacity to AVP can be accounted for by summation of the predicted contributions of an active reflex venodilatatory component and those of a passive component (arterial and cardiopulmonary compartments). Because systemic compliance (delta reservoir volume/delta venous pressure) was not changed by AVP administration, the contribution of a reflex venodilatatory component must be the result of increases in unstressed vascular volume (contained volume at 0 transmural pressure) as opposed to changes in compliance. These results may explain why AVP decreases cardiac output to a greater extent than either angiotensin II or sympathomimetics and, thus, why AVP is a weaker pressor agent in animals with intact autonomic function.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online