AJP - Heart Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 258: H92-H100, 1990;
0363-6135/90 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mendelowitz, D.
Right arrow Articles by Scher, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mendelowitz, D.
Right arrow Articles by Scher, A. M.

AJP - Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Vol 258, Issue 1 92-100, Copyright © 1990 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Pulsatile pressure can prevent rapid baroreflex resetting

D. Mendelowitz and A. M. Scher
Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle 98195.

In a previous study [Am. J. Physiol. 255 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 24): H673-H678, 1988] we demonstrated that baroreflex responses decay (reset) to increased static sinus pressures, but with increased pulsatile pressure, responses are maintained. To determine more conclusively whether pulsatile pressure prevents rapid baroreflex resetting in this study we examined resetting as shifts of the baroreflex (sinus pressure-arterial pressure) curve. In seven anesthesized rabbits the left sinus was vascularly isolated and conditioned for 5 min to static or pulsatile pressures of 60, 100, or 140 mmHg mean pressure, 0 or 35-40 mmHg pulse pressure. The baroreflex curve was then determined by stepwise changing sinus pressure from 40 to 160 mmHg in 20-mmHg increments. Threshold, midpoint, and saturation sinus pressures shifted 25-39% with static conditioning pressures but did not shift significantly with pulsatile pressures. Also, the baroreflex responses to step increases in static sinus pressure decayed, as resetting occurred, but did not decay with pulsatile sinus pressure increases. Thus the baroreflex rapidly resets with static pressures, but there is minimal, if any, resetting with pulsatile pressures.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
R. Zhang, K. Behbehani, C. G. Crandall, J. H. Zuckerman, and B. D. Levine
Dynamic regulation of heart rate during acute hypotension: new insight into baroreflex function
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2001; 280(1): H407 - H419.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
H. A. Drummond and J. L. Seagard
Acute Baroreflex Resetting : Differential Control of Pressure and Nerve Activity
Hypertension, March 1, 1996; 27(3): 442 - 448.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online