AJP - Heart Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 257: H1936-H1944, 1989;
0363-6135/89 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krams, R.
Right arrow Articles by Westerhof, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krams, R.
Right arrow Articles by Westerhof, N.

AJP - Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Vol 257, Issue 6 1936-H1944, Copyright © 1989 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Contractility is the main determinant of coronary systolic flow impediment

R. Krams, P. Sipkema, J. Zegers and N. Westerhof
Laboratory for Physiology, Free University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

We measured the relation between coronary flow amplitude (delta F = Fd-Fs; where d is diastolic and s is systolic) and developed left ventricular pressure (delta PLV = Ps-Pd) at a constant perfusion pressure of 75 mmHg (10 kPa) in the maximally vasodilated blood-perfused isolated cat heart for different steady-state levels of contractility (protocol A) and during transients in contractility (protocol B). Contractility was defined as the slope of the end-systolic pressure-volume relation (Emax). From protocol A it appeared that the coronary flow amplitude was only weakly related to left ventricular pressure at each steady-state level of contractility studied. However, the coronary flow amplitude was strongly related to the different levels of contractility. In protocol B, contractility was changed over a wide range of values (0-100%) but developed pressure and contractility changed simultaneously. Using multiple linear regression analysis, we found that contractility has approximately 10 times (range: 2.8-57.3) stronger effect than left ventricular pressure on coronary flow amplitude (n = 10 experiments). These data and our earlier observations suggest that it is the difference in stiffness of cardiac muscle between systole and diastole that determines coronary flow amplitude.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
D. J. Duncker and R. J. Bache
Regulation of Coronary Blood Flow During Exercise
Physiol Rev, July 1, 2008; 88(3): 1009 - 1086.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
N. Westerhof, C. Boer, R. R. Lamberts, and P. Sipkema
Cross-talk between cardiac muscle and coronary vasculature.
Physiol Rev, October 1, 2006; 86(4): 1263 - 1308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
D. S. Fokkema, J. W. G. E. VanTeeffelen, S. Dekker, I. Vergroesen, J. B. Reitsma, and J. A. E. Spaan
Diastolic time fraction as a determinant of subendocardial perfusion
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2005; 288(5): H2450 - H2456.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
Y.-H. Sun, T. J. Anderson, K. H. Parker, and J. V. Tyberg
Effects of left ventricular contractility and coronary vascular resistance on coronary dynamics
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2004; 286(4): H1590 - H1595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
O. Sorop, J. A. E. Spaan, and E. VanBavel
Pulsation-induced dilation of subendocardial and subepicardial arterioles: effect on vasodilator sensitivity
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2002; 282(1): H311 - H319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
G. S. Kassab and S. Molloi
Cross-sectional area and volume compliance of porcine left coronary arteries
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2001; 281(2): H623 - H628.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J. I. E. Hoffman and W. M. Chilian
Brief commentary on coronary wave-intensity analysis
J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2000; 89(4): 1633 - 1635.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
Y.-H. Sun, T. J. Anderson, K. H. Parker, and J. V. Tyberg
Wave-intensity analysis: a new approach to coronary hemodynamics
J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2000; 89(4): 1636 - 1644.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
H. Mori, E. Tanaka, K. Hyodo, M. U. Mohammed, T. Sekka, K. Ito, Y. Shinozaki, A. Tanaka, H. Nakazawa, S. Abe, et al.
Synchrotron microangiography reveals configurational changes and to-and-fro flow in intramyocardial vessels
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 1999; 276(2): H429 - H437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
R. Cartier, O. S. Dias, M. Pellerin, Y. Hebert, and Y. Leclerc
CHANGING FLOW PATTERN OF THE INTERNAL THORACIC ARTERY UNDERGOING CORONARY BYPASS GRAFTING: CONTINUOUS-WAVE DOPPLER ASSESSMENT
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 1996; 112(1): 52 - 58.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
A. Saeki, F. Recchia, and D. A. Kass
Systolic Flow Augmentation in Hearts Ejecting Into a Model of Stiff Aging Vasculature : Influence on Myocardial Perfusion-Demand Balance
Circ. Res., January 1, 1995; 76(1): 132 - 141.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online