AJP - Heart Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 256: H672-H680, 1989;
0363-6135/89 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Billman, G. E.
Right arrow Articles by Marsh, D. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Billman, G. E.
Right arrow Articles by Marsh, D. H.

AJP - Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Vol 256, Issue 3 672-H680, Copyright © 1989 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Effect of myocardial ischemia on hemodynamic response to carotid occlusion

G. E. Billman and D. H. Marsh
Department of Physiology, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210.

Fourteen mongrel dogs were anesthetized and instrumented to measure arterial pressure (AP), left ventricular pressure (LVP), aortic blood flow, and heart rate (HR). Hydraulic occluders were placed around the left anterior descending (LAD, n = 9) and left circumflex (LCC, n = 14) coronary arteries. A bilateral carotid occlusion (BCO) was made before and during either anterior (LAD occlusion) or posterior (LCC occlusion) ischemia. Posterior ischemia significantly (P less than 0.01) reduced the BCO-induced increases in mean AP (by 44.3 +/- 7.3%), systolic LVP (by 65.5 +/- 6.9%), first derivative of LVP (dLVP/dt, by 95.7 +/- 44.3%), and aortic resistance (by 117.7 +/- 26.9%). In contrast, anterior ischemia failed to alter significantly the hemodynamic response to BCO. Bilateral vagotomy attenuated or eliminated many of the effects of posterior ischemia on the BCO response. In fact, the change in aortic resistance was no longer affected by the ischemia and increased to the same extent, as noted during the control BCO. However, mean AP (38.7 +/- 6.8%), systolic LVP (40.3 +/- 8.7%), and dLVP/dt (62.4 +/- 11.0%) remained significantly reduced when compared with the control (no coronary occlusion) response. These data suggest that 1) posterior ischemia elicits a greater reduction in the BCO response than anterior ischemia, and 2) vagal afferents as well as depression of contractile function may both contribute to the BCO response inhibition noted during posterior ischemia.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online