AJP - Heart Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 256: H567-H573, 1989;
0363-6135/89 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Slinker, B. K.
Right arrow Articles by LeWinter, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Slinker, B. K.
Right arrow Articles by LeWinter, M. M.

AJP - Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Vol 256, Issue 2 567-H573, Copyright © 1989 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Direct diastolic ventricular interaction gain measured with sudden hemodynamic transients

B. K. Slinker, Y. Goto and M. M. LeWinter
Department of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington 05405.

Changes in right ventricular volume affect left ventricular function via direct ventricular interaction mediated by the septum, common myocardial fibers in the free wall, and the pericardium, and also via series interaction mediated by changes in right ventricular output reaching the left ventricle through the pulmonary circulation. To study direct interaction, series interaction must be held constant or removed from the experimental preparation. Because there has been no way to directly measure direct ventricular interaction in the intact circulation, we developed a new method to experimentally separate these two components of ventricular interaction by combining abrupt occlusion of both venae cavae and quick withdrawal of 10-15 ml of blood from the right ventricle. This procedure decreased right ventricular end-diastolic pressure (RVEDP) on the next beat without changing pulmonary venous flow, left ventricular end-diastolic segment lengths, or left ventricular systolic function. The direct interaction gains, quantified as delta LVEDP/delta RVEDP, where LVEDP is left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, and delta refers to the change between the beats before and after reducing right ventricular volume, were (means +/- SD) 0.32 +/- 0.32 at steady-state LVEDP = 5 mmHg, 0.38 +/- 0.23 at LVEDP = 10 mmHg, and 0.28 +/- 0.32 at LVEDP = 15 mmHg. These gains were not significantly different (P greater than 0.50). Therefore, we calculated an overall average gain by pooling data from the three base-line LVEDP conditions. This value is 0.33 with 95% confidence interval 0.16-0.51. This 95% confidence interval indicates our data are consistent with many previous reports of diastolic direct interaction.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
A. E. Baker, R. Dani, E. R. Smith, J. V. Tyberg, and I. Belenkie
Quantitative assessment of independent contributions of pericardium and septum to direct ventricular interaction
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 1998; 275(2): H476 - H483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. H. Pak, W. L. Maughan, K. L. Baughman, and D. A. Kass
Marked Discordance Between Dynamic and Passive Diastolic Pressure-Volume Relations in Idiopathic Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Circulation, July 1, 1996; 94(1): 52 - 60.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online