AJP - Heart Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 256: H441-H445, 1989;
0363-6135/89 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scheel, K. W.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scheel, K. W.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, S. E.

AJP - Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Vol 256, Issue 2 441-H445, Copyright © 1989 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Pressure-flow characteristics of coronary collaterals in dogs

K. W. Scheel, H. Mass and S. E. Williams
Department of Physiology, Texas College of Osteopathic Medicine, Fort Worth 76107.

In this study we utilized two methods to investigate the pressure-flow, P-F, relationship of the coronary collateral vessels in a beating, blood-perfused, isolated heart preparation. In the first method (free-flow method), 12 dog hearts were perfused at pressures ranging from 100 to 0 mmHg, whereas the retrograde flow (index of collateral flow) was measured on the circumflex coronary artery, LCA, against atmospheric pressure, first during autoregulation and then after maximum vasodilation. In the second method (back-pressure method), the back pressure to retrograde flow was varied from 0 to 100 mmHg, whereas the perfusion pressure to the remaining vessels was maintained constant at 100 mmHg. This procedure was performed on four hearts with and without embolization of the LCA by 25-microns spheres. The free-flow method demonstrated a linear P-F relationship with an average correlation coefficient, r, of 0.98. The pressure intercept was 1.7 +/- 1.2 mmHg. The back-pressure method yielded a relationship that was more curvilinear with an average pressure intercept of 13 mmHg without embolization and 38 mmHg with embolization. An analog of the coronary and collateral circulation was used to illustrate that, in the back-pressure method, changes in the coronary resistance at low pressures contributed to the nonlinearity of the collateral P-F characteristics and that the network formed between the collateral and coronary resistances was responsible for the higher pressure intercept value.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online