AJP - Heart Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 256: H32-H40, 1989;
0363-6135/89 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davis, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Sikes, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Davis, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Sikes, P. J.

AJP - Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Vol 256, Issue 1 32-H40, Copyright © 1989 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

A rate-sensitive component to the myogenic response is absent from bat wing arterioles

M. J. Davis and P. J. Sikes
Department of Medical Physiology, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843.

The responses of three sequential branching orders of arterioles in the bat wing to rapid and slow changes in transmural pressure were studied. Arterial and venous pressures to the wing were elevated simultaneously by pressurizing a box containing the body of the animal, while the wing was exposed to atmospheric pressure. Box pressure was elevated from 0 to +48 mmHg at two rates: 24 and 0.6 mmHg/s. During this time, continuous recordings of hydrostatic pressure and diameter were made in single arterioles using intravital microscopic techniques. Second-order arterioles and arcuate arterioles from skin and skeletal muscle constricted in response to elevated transmural pressure but did not show an enhanced response to rapid pressure changes. There was a trend for terminal arterioles to show a transient peak constriction during rapid stretch, but this response was always associated with a biphasic change in arteriolar pressure. These results suggest that the transient arteriolar resistance changes associated with rapid transmural pressure increases in previous experiments may be primarily a result of transient pressure changes in small arterioles. We find no evidence that arterioles in this preparation exhibit a rate-sensitive component to their myogenic response.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online