AJP - Heart Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 253: H1083-H1088, 1987;
0363-6135/87 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Duker, G.
Right arrow Articles by Johansson, B. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Duker, G.
Right arrow Articles by Johansson, B. W.

AJP - Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Vol 253, Issue 5 1083-H1088, Copyright © 1987 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Monophasic action potentials during induced hypothermia in hedgehog and guinea pig hearts

G. Duker, P. O. Sjoquist and B. W. Johansson
Department of Pharmacology and Biochemistry, Hassle Cardiovascular Research Laboratories, Molndal, Sweden.

To evaluate mechanisms behind the difference in susceptibility to ventricular fibrillation (VF) between the guinea pig and hedgehog heart, the cardiac electrophysiology of the two species was studied at normal body temperature and at different hypothermic levels by simultaneous recording of the monophasic action potential (MAP) and the external electrocardiogram (ECG). At normal body temperature, the duration of the ventricular MAP was significantly shorter in the hedgehog (93 +/- 8.1 ms) than in the guinea pig (138 +/- 2.6 ms). There was a distinct plateau phase in the guinea pig, whereas no such phase could be detected in the hedgehog. During hypothermia, a similar increase in MAP duration at full repolarization was noticed for both species. However, the prolongation of the MAP at lower repolarization levels was much less in the hedgehog. Besides, hypothermia-induced slow conduction and dispersion of ventricular repolarization was much more apparent in the guinea pig heart compared with the hedgehog heart. These differences may be important factors in the resistance to VF in the hedgehog, at normal body temperature and during hypothermia.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online