AJP - Heart Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 253: H1059-H1068, 1987;
0363-6135/87 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mitsuoka, T.
Right arrow Articles by Michelson, E. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mitsuoka, T.
Right arrow Articles by Michelson, E. L.

AJP - Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Vol 253, Issue 5 1059-H1068, Copyright © 1987 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Differential vagal effects on antegrade vs. retrograde atrioventricular conduction

T. Mitsuoka, T. Mazgalev, L. S. Dreifus and E. L. Michelson
Lankenau Medical Research Center, Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19151.

The influence of postganglionic vagal stimulation (PGVS) on antegrade and retrograde atrioventricular nodal conduction was studied in 17 isolated rabbit heart tissue preparations by pacing at the crista terminalis or His bundle, respectively. The effect of short bursts of PGVS on prolongation of atrioventricular conduction was phase dependent with respect to the cardiac cycle. This phasic dependency was more pronounced during antegrade atrioventricular conduction. Although the control retrograde atrioventricular conduction time was longer than the antegrade (P less than 0.05) at or near the time in the cycle during which vagal stimulation caused maximal prolongation of conduction time (optimal phase), PGVS-induced maximal prolongation of the antegrade atrioventricular conduction time was significantly greater than that of the retrograde (P less than 0.02). Moreover, when PGVS was introduced at a fixed phase in the cycle, but with increasing amplitude, antegrade atrioventricular conduction time was progressively prolonged, and block was observed first in the antegrade direction, whereas retrograde atrioventricular conduction continued. Microelectrode recordings during these experiments showed consistently that PGVS-induced hyperpolarization in the N region of the atrioventricular node was greater during antegrade atrioventricular conduction. This suggests that vagal effects depended not only on the intensity and phase of stimulation, but also on electronic influences which apparently are different during antegrade and retrograde conduction.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online