AJP - Heart Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 251: H710-H715, 1986;
0363-6135/86 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tse, W. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tse, W. W.

AJP - Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Vol 251, Issue 4 710-H715, Copyright © 1986 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Suppressive effect of acetylcholine on action potentials of canine paranodal fibers

W. W. Tse

The canine atrioventricular (AV) junction comprises three major tissues: paranodal fibers (PNF), AV node (AVN), and His bundle (HB). In the present study, dissection-exposed, in vitro canine AV junctional preparations were used. The object of the study was to determine whether the PNF or AVN was more sensitive to the suppressive effect of acetylcholine (ACh). In five experiments these tissues were stimulated antegradely and retrogradely, and their action potentials were recorded simultaneously under the influence of ACh (0.5 micrograms/ml). Results indicated the PNF were more sensitive to the suppressive effect of ACh than were the AVN. In another group of 13 experiments, the effects of ACh at 0.05-0.3 micrograms/ml on rate of rise of phase 0 of action potentials (Vmax), peak potential, resting membrane potential, and action potential duration of the PNF were determined. Results indicated that ACh exerted a strong suppressive effect on Vmax and amplitude of the action potentials and had little effect on the resting membrane potential and action potential duration of the PNF. In 10 of 13 preparations, ACh also suppressed the response of PNF, resulting in generation of one action potential to every two stimuli. In conclusion, these findings suggest that PNF could be the tissue responsible for vagal-induced AV conduction block.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online