AJP - Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Vol 251, Issue 3 619-H630, Copyright © 1986 by American Physiological Society

ARTICLES

Phasic effects of postganglionic vagal stimulation on atrioventricular nodal conduction

T. Mazgalev, L. S. Dreifus, E. L. Michelson, A. Pelleg and R. Price

The effects of postganglionic vagal stimulation (PGVS) on atrioventricular nodal conduction were studied in 15 rabbit atrial-atrioventricular nodal preparations. PGVS was introduced, and sinus cycle length was scanned as independent bursts of subthreshold stimuli were produced in the sinus node and atrioventricular node (AVN). Changes in conduction of atrial impulses to the bundle of His were studied under the following experimental conditions: changes in sinus cycle length resulting from vagal influence on the sinus node, direct vagal stimulation exclusively to the AVN, and during both simultaneous or nonsimultaneous vagal stimulation to sinus node and AVN. The results of the present study showed that the direct effect of PGVS on AVN conduction time at a constant sinus cycle length is phase dependent with maximal prolongation achieved in the first or second beat after introduction of the burst. The interval between the onset of PGVS producing maximal prolongation of conduction time and the following atrial beat was designated the "optimal effective phase." It was shown that the optimal effective phase was a constant parameter for a given preparation and in the present experiments was 321 +/- 16 ms. However, when PGVS was introduced in combination to both nodes while scanning the cycle length, AVN conduction was variable, reflecting both the direct effects of PGVS on the AVN as well as the indirect effects resulting from changes in the sinus cycle length. Notably, it was found that simultaneous PGVS to both the sinus node and AVN usually diminished, whereas appropriate nonsimultaneous PGVS accentuated the typical phasic dependency of AVN conduction time. Additionally, vagally induced prolongation of the sinus cycle length was found to be accompanied by changes in the time of depolarization of the inputs to the AVN, thus influencing AVN conduction and facilitating reentry. These interactions between changes in the sinus cycle length and concomitant changes in the effectiveness of vagal influence on the AVN can be used to explain complexities of AVN conduction during increased vagal activity.