AJP - Heart Myographs and Tissue organ baths
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 249: H929-H944, 1985;
0363-6135/85 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wiig, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wiig, H.

AJP - Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Vol 249, Issue 5 929-H944, Copyright © 1985 by American Physiological Society

ARTICLES

Comparison of methods for measurement of interstitial fluid pressure in cat skin/subcutis and muscle

H. Wiig

Interstitial fluid pressure (IFP) in cats was measured with four techniques, i.e., hollow perforated and porous polyethylene capsules, wick in needle (WIN), and micropipettes. During control conditions, skin IFP of -1.5 +/- 0.4 (SD) mmHg (n = 53) was obtained with micropipettes, whereas pressures recorded in subcutis with perforated and porous capsules were -1.6 +/- 0.9 (n = 26) and -1.6 +/- 0.8 mmHg (n = 13), respectively. These were all significantly different from the -1.2 +/- 0.5 mmHg (n = 50) obtained in subcutis with WIN. In skeletal muscle, control IFP of -0.5, -0.5, and -1.1 mmHg was measured with micropipettes, WIN, and porous capsules, respectively. During peritoneal dialysis skin and muscle IFP recorded with micropipettes and WIN was reduced by 3-3.5 mmHg, whereas pressure in porous and perforated capsules fell by 7 and 10 mmHg, respectively. Intravenous Ringer infusion caused a marked transient rise in capsular pressures, not reflected by micropipettes and WIN, but similar pressures were obtained 210 min after infusion. In conclusion, all techniques reflect true IFP under steady-state conditions. Both capsules apparently act like osmometers in acute overhydration or dehydration and are, in addition, sensitive to pressure changes in local veins and are therefore not suitable for measurement of changes in IFP that take place in less than a few hours.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
R. M. Dongaonkar, C. M. Quick, R. H. Stewart, R. E. Drake, C. S. Cox Jr., and G. A. Laine
Edemagenic gain and interstitial fluid volume regulation
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, February 1, 2008; 294(2): R651 - R659.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
T. V. Karlsen, V. V. Iversen, E. Forsberg, L. Kjellen, R. K. Reed, and E.-A. B. Gjerde
Neurogenic inflammation in mice deficient in heparin-synthesizing enzyme
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2004; 286(3): H884 - H888.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online