AJP - Heart Calcium Transients and Cell-Sarcomere
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 248: H452-H456, 1985;
0363-6135/85 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Watson, P. D.
Right arrow Articles by Wolf, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Watson, P. D.
Right arrow Articles by Wolf, M. B.

AJP - Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Vol 248, Issue 4 452-H456, Copyright © 1985 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Dextran and capillary filtration coefficient in cat hindlimb

P. D. Watson and M. B. Wolf

To investigate the possible mechanisms through which dextran modifies capillary filtration coefficient (CFC), the effects of perfusion with a protein-free dextran solution were compared with those of perfusion with a Ringerlike solution. With the use of the isolated cat hindlimb, CFC was measured during perfusion at constant flow with three solutions, a control blood-albumin mixture, a Ringerlike solution called dialysate, and 3.7 g/dl dextran dissolved in dialysate. The solutions were warmed to 37-38 degrees C, bubbled with 95% O2-5% CO2, and contained 0.015 g/dl or more papaverine. CFC was calculated from the rate of limb weight gain following a step increase in venous pressure. Dextran perfusion increased CFC to 2.0 +/- 0.2 (SD, n = 8) times control, which was significantly less (P less than 0.001) than 3.1 +/- 0.6 (n = 8) times control previously reported for dialysate perfusion. The difference between the measured viscosity of dextran (1.35 cP) and dialysate (0.72) could account for this reduction. However, when a dialysate perfusion followed a dextran perfusion, CFC only increased to 2.3 +/- 0.4 (n = 8) times control. This value is also significantly less (P less than 0.01) than 3.1. This observation suggests 1) that dextran is retained within the transcapillary channel and 2) that dextran reduces CFC mainly by partially blocking the transcapillary channel rather than by increasing viscosity.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online