AJP - Heart Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 242: H942-H948, 1982;
0363-6135/82 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Suga, H.
Right arrow Articles by Ninomiya, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Suga, H.
Right arrow Articles by Ninomiya, I.

AJP - Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Vol 242, Issue 6 942-H948, Copyright © 1982 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Mechanism of higher oxygen consumption rate: pressure-loaded vs. volume-loaded heart

H. Suga, R. Hisano, S. Hirata, T. Hayashi and I. Ninomiya

The greater cardiac oxygen consumption (VO2) under pressure than under volume load has been accounted for by the greater ventricular wall force under pressure load. We cannot fully agree with this because the wall force has not always been uniquely correlated with VO2. We attempted to account for the greater VO2 under pressure load by the ventricular systolic pressure-volume area (PVA), which we previously showed uniquely correlated with VO2. In isolated supported canine hearts, we produced servo-controlled ejecting contractions the stroke work (SW) of which was doubled from control by doubling ejection pressure (P) with comparable stroke volume (SV) and by doubling Sv with comparable P. Despite comparable increments in SW from 370 to 680 mmHg.ml under two different loads, VO2 and PVA increased significantly more under pressure load (from 0.033 ml O2/beat and 800 mmHg.ml to 0.0560 and 1,800, respectively) than under volume load (increasing to 0.038 and 1,200, respectively; P less than 0.01). These results suggested to us a new mechanism underlying the greater VO2 under pressure load.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online