AJP - Heart Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 241: H789-H794, 1981;
0363-6135/81 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cox, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Bagshaw, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cox, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Bagshaw, R. J.

AJP - Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Vol 241, Issue 6 789-H794, Copyright © 1981 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Reflex control of canine hindlimb resistance under different modes of perfusion

R. H. Cox and R. J. Bagshaw

The carotid sinus control of hindlimb hemodynamics was determined in halothane-anesthetized vagotomized dogs. The carotid sinuses were bilaterally isolated and perfused under controlled conditions. The hindlimb was perfused under conditions of 1) physiological inflow, 2) constant pressure, and 3) constant flow. The variation of hindlimb resistance with mean carotid sinus perfusion pressure was largest under conditions of constant-pressure perfusion and smallest with physiological inflow. Values for constant-flow perfusion were intermediate. The effects of different values of constant-flow perfusion on the carotid sinus control of hindlimb hemodynamics was also determined. Values of hindlimb resistance increased with decreasing flow rate as did the variation with carotid sinus perfusion pressure. No evidence of a contribution of local control mechanisms related to changes in perfusion pressure or bed inflow could be demonstrated. The differences in the variation of hindlimb resistance with carotid sinus pressure under the various perfusion conditions can be explained on the basis of the mechanics of vascular smooth muscle. The amount of lumen constriction associated with changes in degree of activation depends on the conditions under which shortening occurs as well as upon the initial muscle length. It appears that local factors do not contribute to the control of hindlimb hemodynamics under the conditions in which these studies were performed.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online