AJP - Heart Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (April 25, 2008). doi:10.1152/ajpheart.01225.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
294/6/H2421    most recent
01225.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ullrich, N. D
Right arrow Articles by MacLeod, K. T
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ullrich, N. D
Right arrow Articles by MacLeod, K. T
Submitted on October 22, 2007
Accepted on April 21, 2008

Genomic deletion of estrogen receptors ER{alpha} and {beta} does not alter estrogen-mediated inhibition of Ca2+ influx and contraction in murine cardiomyocytes

Nina D Ullrich, Andree Krust, Peter Collins, and Kenneth T MacLeod1*

1 National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: k.t.macleod{at}imperial.ac.uk.

Estrogens modify contraction of vascular smooth muscle and cardiomyocytes but suggestions that they confer protective effects on the cardiovascular system remain controversial. The negative inotropic effects of estrogens are a consequence of L-type Ca2+ channel inhibition but the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. We tested the hypothesis that membrane-associated estrogen receptors (ER) {alpha} and {beta} are involved. We measured the effect of estrogens on Ca2+ current (ICaL) in isolated ventricular cardiomyocytes of wild-type (WT), ER{alpha} knock-out (KO) and ER{beta}KO mice using the whole-cell patch clamp technique at 37°C. No differences in current densities or inactivation profiles of ICaL were found under control conditions in WT, ER{alpha}KO and ER{beta}KO cardiomyocytes suggesting that absence of either ER has no effect on functional properties of ICaL. In all groups, application of raloxifene (2µM), 17{alpha}- or 17{beta}-estradiol (50µM) reduced ICaL (P<0.001). Raloxifene decreased ICaL by 44±9% (mean±SEM) in WT (n=5), 34±5% in ER{alpha}KO (n=5) and 30±5% in ER{beta}KO (n=8). 17{alpha}-estradiol reduced ICaL by 41±10% (WT, n=4), 34±12% (ER{alpha}KO, n=7) and 38±8% (ER{beta}KO, n=7). 17{beta}-estradiol inhibited ICaL by 31±4% (WT, n=4), 28±6% (ER{alpha}KO, n=3) and 42±3% (ER{beta}KO, n=5). Decreases in cell shortening occurred in parallel with these findings. Our results suggest that inhibition of ICaL and the decrease in contraction by estrogens do not depend on ER{alpha} or {beta}.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.